Rodgers v. Fitzgerald et al

Filing 26

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 25 Stipulation.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2014)

Download PDF
Case4:14-cv-00985-DMR Document25 Filed09/12/14 Page1 of 3 1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP SHANE SINGH, SB# 202733 E-Mail: Shane.Singh@lewisbrisbois.com 2 2850 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 450 3 Sacramento, California 95833 Telephone: 916.564.5400 4 Facsimile: 916.564.5444 5 Attorneys for Defendants, C FOOD CONCEPTS, INC. and 6 THOMAS J. FITZGERALD, Trustee of the Family Trust 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 JOHN RODGERS, Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 15 THOMAS J. FITZGERALD, TRUSTEE OF THE FAMILY TRUST; SIZZLER USA, 16 INC., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a SIZZLER RESTAURANT; and DOES 1-10 includsive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 CASE NO. 4:14-CV-00985-DMR STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE JOINT INSPECTION UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56 & ORDER The Hon. Donna M. Ryu FSC Date: Trial Date: March 4, 2014 None Set Plaintiff JOHN RODGERS and Defendants THOMAS J. FITZGERALD, TRUSTEE OF 20 THE FAMILY TRUST and C FOOD CONCEPTS, INC., a California corporation, d/b/a 21 SIZZLER RESTAURANT hereby stipulate as follows: 22 1. This is an ADA accessibility action. Pursuant to General Order 56 of the U.S. 23 District Court for the Northern District of California, not later than 105 days after the filing of 24 plaintiff’s complaint, the parties and their counsel are required to meet in person at the subject 25 premises. That deadline was currently August 29, 2014. 26 2. Counsel for both parties have not able to conduct a joint inspection before the 27 deadline in that the subject facility is in the process underwent major renovations. The site was LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 28 closed down during the renovations and not open to the public. 4839-2880-1564.1 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE JOINT INSPECTION UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56 & ORDER Case4:14-cv-00985-DMR Document25 Filed09/12/14 Page2 of 3 1 3. Counsel for both parties have been diligent in scheduling the joint inspection, but 2 will not be able to conduct it prior to the above deadline. 3 4. As such, the parties stipulate to continue the deadline to complete the joint 4 inspection from August 31, 2014 to September 22, 2014. The parties have scheduled this General 5 Order inspection to take place on September 22, 2014. 6 5. Request is also made to continue the corresponding mediation deadline. 7 DATED: September 8, 2014 8 9 By: 10 /s/ Irene Karbelashvili, Esq. Irene Karbelashvili Attorneys for Plaintiff, John Rodgers 11 12 DATED: September 12, 2014 13 SHANE SINGH LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 14 By: 15 16 17 /s/ Shane Sing, Esq. Shane Singh Attorneys for Defendants, C FOOD CONCEPTS, INC. and THOMAS J. FITZGERALD, Trustee of the Family Trust 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 28 4839-2880-1564.1 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE JOINT INSPECTION UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56 & ORDER Case4:14-cv-00985-DMR Document25 Filed09/12/14 Page3 of 3 1 2 ORDER The Court, having considered the stipulation between the parties, and good cause 3 appearing therefore: 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 5 The deadline for the parties to complete the joint inspection required under the General 6 Order 56 of the U.S. District Court for Northern District of California is continued from August 7 31, 2014 to September 22, 2014. 8 9 10 September 15, 2014 11 DATED: _______________________ 12 13 Honorable Donna M. Ryu 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 28 4839-2880-1564.1 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE JOINT INSPECTION UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56 & ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?