Rodgers v. Fitzgerald et al
Filing
51
ORDER requesting Supplemental Information re 41 MOTION for Attorney Fees . Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/8/2016. (dmrlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JOHN RODGERS,
Case No. 14-cv-00985-DMR
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
THOMAS J FITZGERALD, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER REQUESTING
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION RE
MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES
Re: Dkt. No. 41
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
The parties in this case attended court-sponsored mediation on June 15, 2015 at which the
13
case partially settled. [Docket No. 35]. The Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement on July 28, 2015
14
[Docket No. 37], informing the court that they had reached an agreement that fully resolved the
15
claims in this case.
16
Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees [Docket No. 41] is currently before the court. The
17
parties’ briefing on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees did not address whether the parties
18
took action in compliance with General Order 56 ¶ 6.
19
The parties shall submit a joint letter to the court stating whether, when the parties reached
20
a tentative agreement on injunctive relief: 1) Plaintiff provided Defendants with a statement of
21
costs and attorney’s fees incurred to date and made a demand for settlement of the entire case, and
22
2) whether Defendants requested, and Plaintiff provided documentation and support for its
23
attorney’s fees similar to what an attorney would provide in a billing statement to a client.
24
The parties shall file the joint letter, of no more than one page, by 5:00 p.m. on April 11, 2016.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 8, 2016
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?