Perez et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 118

ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 6/24/2015. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2015)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

MONIQUE PEREZ, et al.,

7
8
9

Case No. 14-cv-0989-PJH

Plaintiffs,

6
v.

ORDER

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Plaintiffs’ motion to sever the New York claims and dismiss the California claims

13

remains pending before the court. Plaintiffs filed the motion on March 19, 2015, and on

14

April 15, 2015, the court issued an order vacating the hearing and advising that it would

15

not rule on the motion until the pleadings were settled. On April 24, 2015, the court

16

issued an order dismissing the second amended complaint with leave to amend.

17

Plaintiffs filed the third amended complaint (“TAC”) on May 26, 2015, and defendants

18

filed an answer to the TAC on June 12, 2015.

19

In view of the modifications reflected in the TAC, plaintiffs are hereby directed to

20

file, no later than July 8, 2015, either a revised motion to sever (to reflect the correct

21

status of the pleadings and the case) or a statement that they wish to stand on the motion

22

as filed. Defendants shall respond two weeks thereafter with either an opposition to a

23

new motion or a surreply should plaintiffs choose not to revise.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 24, 2015
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge