Taylor v. San Mateo Police Department
Filing
41
ORDER to Submit Supplemental Briefing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 02/04/2015. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
PHILLUP TAYLOR,
12
13
Plaintiff(s),
No. C-14-01000 DMR
ORDER TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING
v.
14
SAN MATEO POLICE DEPARTMENT,
15
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
16
17
The court has reviewed the parties’ submissions regarding Defendant’s motion for sanctions.
18
[Docket Nos. 38, 39.] In his declaration, defense counsel summarizes the time for which Defendant
19
seeks reimbursement from Plaintiff and his counsel. (Atkinson Decl., Jan. 9, 2015, ¶ 89.) The court
20
orders Defendant to submit a more detailed accounting sufficient to support Defendant’s requested
21
award of reasonable attorney’s fees for the alleged discovery misconduct at issue in this motion,
22
such that the court may determine whether the time spent was “excessive, redundant, or otherwise
23
unnecessary.” Hensley v. Eckerhart , 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983); see also N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 54-5.
24
Such briefing shall be filed by no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 9, 2015. If Plaintiff challenges
25
the amount of attorney’s fees sought, he must identify specific entries to which he objects by no later
26
than 5:00 p.m. on February 11, 2015.
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
7
8
9
10
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
R NIA
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
. Ryu
nna M
LI
ER
FO
o
Judge D
H
6
RT
5
NO
4
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
A
3
Dated: February 4, 2015
UNIT
ED
2
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?