Ambriz et al v. Matheson Tri-Gas
Filing
23
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 22 Motion to Appear by Telephone. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DESAI LAW FIRM, P.C.
Aashish Y. Desai, Esq. (SBN 187394)
Adrianne De Castro, Esq. (SBN 238930)
3200 Bristol Street, Ste. 650
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone: (949) 614-5830
Facsimile: (949) 271-4190
aashish@desai-law.com
adrianne@desai-law.com
THE FELDMAN LAW FIRM
Lee R. Feldman (SBN 171628)
Alicia Olivares (SBN 181412)
Leonard H. Sansanowicz (SBN 255729)
10100 Santa Monica Boulevard # 2490
Century City, CA 90067
lee@leefeldmanlaw.com
alicia@leefeldmanlaw.com
leonard@leefedlmanlaw.com
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
LARRY AMBRIZ, SALVADOR
CARRILLO, MARCO A. CHAVEZ,
RANDALL COURTNEY, DANIEL
MALDONADO, MARK A.
RODRIGUEZ, SR., ALEJANDRO
VEGA, DOUGLAS VIVERO, DAVID
CINTAT, MANUEL SALAZAR,
HERSCHEL SURVINE III, EDWIN
PUQUIRRE on behalf of themselves and
all others similarly situated, and on behalf
of all other “aggrieved” employees,
Plaintiffs,
22
23
24
25
26
27
vs.
MATHESON TRI-GAS, a New Jersey
Corporation, and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
28
1
CASE NO.: C14-1041 CW
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST
TO APPEAR
TELEPHONICALLY
HEARING SCHEDULE
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:
June 5, 2014
2:00 p.m.
2, 4th Floor
Claudia W
1
2
3
4
This Court has received Plaintiffs’ Request to Appear Telephonically for the
hearing date of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer the
Action to the Central District of California, presently set on June 5, 2014 at 2:00
p.m.
5
6
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Request to Appear
Telephonically is granted. Defendants' counsel may appear by telephone as
well.
8
9
10
11
DATED: June 3, 2014
_____________________________________
HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?