Titus et al v. Humboldt County Fair Association et al

Filing 116

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu regarding 110 and 112 Discovery Letter Briefs.(dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STUART P. TITUS, et al., Case No. 14-cv-01043-SBA (DMR) Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEFS 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 HUMBOLDT COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 110, 112 Defendants. 12 13 The court is in receipt of the parties’ November 4, 2015 joint discovery letter [Docket No. 14 110] and November 13, 2015 letter from Ms. Tyler [Docket No. 112] regarding the attendance of 15 Ms. Tyler at upcoming depositions. The court finds that the matter is appropriate for resolution 16 without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). 17 Depositions are scheduled to begin on November 16, 2015. [Docket No. 110]. Ms. Tyler 18 is not a party; she is a claims manager for defendants’ insuring entity. Plaintiffs seek to exclude 19 her from attending depositions due to allegedly disruptive conduct in past depositions. Defendants 20 assert that she was not disruptive, and should be able to attend in order to observe the deponents 21 and assess their effectiveness and credibility. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties have represented to the court that all of the scheduled depositions, with the exception of one, will be videotaped, and that arrangements can easily be made for a person to observe all scheduled future depositions by Skype, Facetime, or a similar program. [Docket No. 114.] Therefore, the court rules as follows. Ms. Tyler may observe the depositions remotely through a system such as Skype, Facetime, or similar program. The program shall be muted on Ms. Tyler’s side during the deposition, so that she can type on her computer without causing noise in the deposition room, while having the opportunity to observe the witness. Ms. Tyler will also 1 be able to assess the witnesses by viewing their videotaped depositions. 2 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 13, 2015 ______________________________________ Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?