Titus et al v. Humboldt County Fair Association et al

Filing 53

CORRECTED 52 ORDER Denying as moot [51 ] Motion to Appear by Telephone. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 1/28/2015. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2015)

Case4:14-cv-01043-SBA Document51 Filed01/23/15 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

Peter E. Martin, SBN 121672
Christopher Einselen SBN 294273
Peter E. Martin, A Law Corporation
917 Third Street
Eureka, California 95501
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
STUART P. TITUS, CAROLINE TITUS

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11

)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
)
HUMBOLDT COUNTY FAIR
ASSOCIATION, JEFF FARLEY, CINDY )
)
OLSEN, JOHN BURGER, Does 1
)
through 10,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_________________________________ )
STUART P. TITUS, CAROLINE TITUS,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Case No. 14-cv-01043-SBA
CORRECTED
REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT THE
HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO
AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THEIR
COMPLAINT
Date:
Time:
Crtrm:

March 3, 2015
1:00 p.m.
TBD

20
21
22

TO THE HONORABLE SENIOR DISTRICT COURT JUDGE SAUNDRA BROWN
ARMSTRONG:

23
24
25

Plaintiffs respectfully request to appear telephonically at the hearing on their Motion
to Amend and Supplement their Complaint scheduled to be heard on March 3, 2015, at

26

1:00 p.m. in this Court.
27
28
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT THE HEARING ON THEIR MOTION TO
AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THEIR COMPLAINT
TITUS v. HUMBOLDT COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION, et al.

1

Case4:14-cv-01043-SBA Document51 Filed01/23/15 Page2 of 2

1

The reason for this request is that plaintiffs and their counsel reside in Humboldt

2

County, CA, approximately 275 miles, and an approximately 5 hour drive, from the

3

Oakland Courthouse for the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. In addition,

4

plaintiffs' lead counsel has trials or is otherwise occupied in the mornings on every

5

Tuesday until September.
6
7
8

Dated: January 23, 2015

Respecftully Submitted,

9
10

/s/ Peter E. Martin
________________________
Peter E. Martin
Christopher R. Einselen
Attorneys for plaintiffs

11
12
13
14
15
16

ORDER

17
18
19
20

The read and considered Plaintiffs' request to appear by telephone, the Court hereby DENIES
plaintiffs'
Having Court having read and considered this Request, hereby GRANTS DENIED
themoot because thebecause theresolvewill resolve the motion without oralciting Civ. L.R. 7-1(b).
as request as moot court will court the motion without oral argument, argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b).
request to appear by telephone at the hearing on their Motion to Amend and Supplement
their Complaint.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26

Dated: 1/28/2015

_________________________________
HONORABLE SENIOR DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE SUSAN BROWN ARMSTRONG

27
28
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
___
___
PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT THE HEARING ON THEIR MOTION TO
AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THEIR COMPLAINT
TITUS v. HUMBOLDT COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION, et al.

2