Wu v. Aiken et al

Filing 4

ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing is set for Friday, 7/11/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/6/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 YUAN HUI WU, 7 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, Case No.: 14-CV-1062 YGR ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING vs. TIMOTHY S. AIKEN, et al., Defendants. The Court, having received and reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the above action, hereby orders as follows: No later than Friday, June 27, 2014, Petitioner shall file a statement of up to three pages apprising the Court as to the status of this case, including, but not limited to: (1) whether Defendants have been served with the instant petition (Dkt. No. 1), (2) whether Petitioner has received an individualized bond hearing pursuant to the 9th Circuit’s ruling in Rodriguez v. Robbins, 715 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2013), and (3) whether Petitioner intends to prosecute the instant action. A compliance hearing regarding Petitioner’s statement shall be held on Friday, July 11, 2014 20 on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, 21 Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, Petitioner shall file 22 either: (a) the statement as set forth above; or (b) a one-page statement setting forth an explanation for 23 his failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the counsel for Petitioner need not appear and the 24 compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 6, 2014 ____________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?