Cash v. Buckingham Wine and Spirits et al
Filing
19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 10/6/2014 02:01 PM. Show Cause Response due by 9/29/2014. Stipulation to Reset Case Management Conference 18 is Denied as Moot. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 09/23/2014. (ygrlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
HOLLY CASH,
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Case No.: 14-CV-1469 YGR
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
BUCKINGHAM WINE AND SPIRITS;
ASHOKKUMAR N. PATEL; JYOTSNA A.
PATEL,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
TO PLAINTIFF AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
You are HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why you should not be sanctioned for failure
18
to appear at the initial case management conference ("CMC") duly scheduled for and held on
19
Monday, September 22, 2014. As set forth on the record, while the parties filed a stipulation to
20
continue the CMC (Dkt. No. 18), they did so in the afternoon of the last business day before the
21
CMC and the Court did not approve their stipulation.1 Counsel's appearance therefore was
22
required.
23
A hearing on this Order to Show Cause will be held on the Court's 2:01 p.m. calendar on
24
Monday, October 6, 2014 in Courtroom 1 of the United States Courthouse located at 1301 Clay
25
Street in Oakland, California. At least five business days prior to the Order to Show cause hearing:
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff's counsel shall file a written response to this Order to Show Cause, if he
contests it. Failure to file timely a written response or to appear at the Order to
The parties' stipulation is DENIED.
Show Cause hearing shall be deemed an admission that good causes exists to impose
a monetary sanction.
1
2
3
Defendants' counsel shall file a declaration setting forth and substantiating the costs
incurred by defense counsel in attending the September 22 CMC.
In conjunction with the Order to Show Cause hearing on October 6, the Court shall hold
4
another case management conference. Should the parties settle the case, they shall file a notice of
5
settlement forthwith.
6
This Order terminates Dkt. No. 18.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
Date: September 23, 2014
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?