Rha vs. Asiana Airlines
Filing
14
ORDER [with respect to Rha v Asiana Airlines, et al., Case No. 14-cv-1486-YGR]Once parties reach consensus on a strategy for resolution of this case, the parties may file a request for a trial setting. Alternatively, counsel may request a case management conference to discuss the matter further.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/29/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2015)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
IN RE:
MDL No.: 2497
7
AIR CRASH AT SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA, ON JULY 6, 2013
TRIAL SETTING ORDER
8
THIS ORDER RELATES TO:
9
Qian v. Asiana Airlines, Inc. et al.
Case No. 13-CV-3684
10
11
Andrighetto v. Asiana Airlines et al.
Case No. 13-CV-3687
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
Chen v. Asiana Airlines et al.
Case No. 13-CV-3881
13
14
Rha v. Asiana Airlines, et al.
Case No. 14-CV-1486
15
16
17
The Court, having received and reviewed the parties’ Joint Report Re Cases to be Set for Trial
(Dkt. No, 246), hereby ORDERS as follows:
18
19
20
With respect to three cases: (1) Qian v. Asiana Airlines, Inc. et al., Case No. 13-CV-3684; (2)
Andrighetto v. Asiana Airlines et al., Case No. 13-CV-3687; (3) Chen v. Asiana Airlines et al., Case
No. 13-CV-3881, the Court sets the following trial and pretrial dates:
21
22
PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:
23
24
Andrighetto/Quan: August 13, 2015
EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:
25
26
Chen: October 26, 2015
Chen: December 28, 2015
Andrighetto/Quan: October 12, 2015
DISPOSITIVE AND DAUBERT MOTIONS1 HEARD BY:
10 weeks prior to trial date
27
28
1
See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary
judgment.
1
COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE BELOW)
Friday, March 11, 2016 at 9:01 a.m.
2
JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT:
March 18, 2016
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:
Friday, April 1, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.
3
4
5
TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH:
Monday, April 25, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. for
eight days (Jury Trial)
6
7
Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall meet
hearing on Friday, March 11, 2016 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have timely met
10
and conferred as required by the Pretrial Instructions. The compliance hearing shall be held in the
11
Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days
12
Northern District of California
and confer at least twenty-one (21) days in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance
9
United States District Court
8
prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file a one-page JOINT STATEMENT
13
confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If
14
compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off
15
calendar. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.
16
The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing
17
Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All Standing
18
Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.
19
With respect to the fourth case, Rha v. Asiana Airlines, et al., Case No. 14-CV-1486, having
20
reviewed and considered the parties’ submission, the Court is not inclined to permit piecemeal
21
litigation of that case. Once the parties reach consensus on a strategy for resolution of this case, the
22
parties may file a request for a trial setting. Alternatively, counsel may request a case management
23
conference to discuss the matter further.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 29, 2015
____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?