Magpul Industries Corp. v. John Does 1-10
Filing
74
ORDER ADOPTING 72 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON 63 MOTION for Default Judgment by the Court. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/16/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
MAGPUL INDUSTRIES CORP.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
No. C 14-01556 JSW
Plaintiff,
v.
TONG ZEJUN, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
15
16
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Report and
17
Recommendation (“Report”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Vadas (ECF No. 72), in which
18
he recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (ECF No. 63), and
19
enter judgment against Defendant Tong as follows:
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Tong, and those acting at his direction, be forever enjoined from:
(1) using Magpul’s trademarks in connection with the sale of any
unauthorized goods; (2) infringing upon the Magpul Marks; (3)
unfairly competing with Magpul; (4) falsely representing
themselves as being connected with Magpul; (5) using any
reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of Magpul’s
trademarks in connection with publicity, promotion, or sale of
goods, and; (6) affixing, applying, annexing, or using in
connection with the sale of any goods, a false description or
representation that describe or represent such goods as being
those of Magpul; and $120,000.00 in monetary damages.
(ECF No. 72 at 13.)
The deadline for filing objections to the Report has passed, and neither party has filed
objections. The Court has considered the Report, relevant legal authority, and the record in this
1
case. The Court finds the Report thorough and well reasoned and adopts it in every respect.
2
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: December 16, 2014
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?