PersonalWeb Technologies LLC et al v. Apple Inc.

Filing 133

ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 6/22/2015 02:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Compliance Hearing regarding the status of the inter partes review proceedings on the '310 patent is set for Friday, 6/5/2015 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/2/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 9 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL., Plaintiffs, 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 Case No.: 4:14–CV–1683 YGR ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. APPLE INC., Defendant. On September 24, 2014, the Court stayed this case “pending final exhaustion of the inter 15 partes review proceedings to which U.S. Patent No. 7,802,310 is currently subject.” (Dkt. No. 131 16 at 10.) On March 31, 2015, defendant filed a status report apprising the Court that the Patent Trial 17 and Appeal Board has issued a Final Written Decision regarding each of the challenged claims of 18 the ’310 patent. (Dkt. No. 132 at 1.) Defendant proposed, consistent with the Court’s September 19 24, 2014 Order, that the stay should remain in place “until either PersonalWeb has exhausted its 20 appeals, or its time to appeal has expired.” (Id.) 21 A compliance hearing regarding the appellate status of the inter partes review proceedings 22 on the ’310 patent shall be held on Friday, June 5, 2015 on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the 23 Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days 24 prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file either: (1) a joint status report 25 apprising the Court of the appellate status of the inter partes review decision on the ’310 patent; or 26 (2) a one-page joint statement setting forth an explanation for their failure to comply. If 27 compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off 28 1 calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in 2 a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions. 3 The Court also SETS a Case Management Conference (“CMC”) for 2 p.m. on June 22, 4 2015, in Courtroom 1. If the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision is not appealed, the parties 5 shall file a joint case management conference statement in advance of the CMC pursuant to 6 applicable local rules and standing orders. If an appeal is filed, the Court will vacate the CMC and 7 set a calendar for periodic updates. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED 9 10 Date: April 2, 2015 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?