Thomas et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
Filing
17
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO VACATE WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 16 Notice OF SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 7/21/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2014)
Case4:14-cv-01711-JSW Document16 Filed07/19/14 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
G. Thomas Martin, III (SBN 218456)
PRICE LAW GROUP, APC
15760 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100
Encino, CA 91436
Direct Dial: (818) 907-2030
Fax: (818) 205-2730
tom@plglawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
ANDREW and MICHELLE THOMAS
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
ANDREW THOMAS and
MICHELLE THOMAS,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC;
and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 4:14-cv-01711-JSW
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
AND ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO VACATE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
17
Plaintiffs, ANDREW and MICHELLE THOMAS, by and through their
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
attorney, informs this Honorable Court that Plaintiffs have settled their case with
Defendant, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC. The parties are in the process of
finalizing settlement, and Plaintiffs anticipate the settlement will be finalized in 40
days. Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Honorable Court vacate all dates
///
///
///
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
-1-
Case4:14-cv-01711-JSW Document16 Filed07/19/14 Page2 of 2
1
currently set on calendar for this case.
2
3
Respectfully submitted this 19th day of July, 2014,
4
5
PRICE LAW GROUP APC
6
7
8
By: /s/ G. Thomas Martin, III _
G. Thomas Martin, III
Attorney for Plaintiff
9
10
11
12
13
Plaintiffs' unilateral request to vacate all deadlines is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs
may resubmit their request in the form of a stipulation and proposed order, signed by Defendant, which
has appeared in this matter through counsel.
July 21, 2014
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?