NetApp, Inc. v. Crossroads Systems, Inc.
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING 30 STIPULATION for Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/19/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014)
Case4:14-cv-01727-JSW Document30 Filed06/18/14 Page1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
DUANE MORRIS LLP
Karineh Khachatourian (SBN 202634)
kkhachatourian@duanemorris.com
David T. Xue (SBN 256668)
dtxue@duanemorris.com
Patrick S. Salceda (SBN 247978)
psalceda@duanemorris.com
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: 650.847.4150
Facsimile: 650.847.4151
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NETAPP, INC.
WONG CABELLO LUTSCH
RUTHERFORD & BRUCCULERI, LLP
Russell T. Wong
rwong@counselip.com
Texas Bar No. 21884235
Admitted to the NDCA
20333 SH 249, Suite 600
Houston, TX 77070
Telephone: 832.446.2400
Facsimile: 832.446.2424
Attorneys for Defendant
CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
NETAPP, INC.
13
14
15
16
17
Case No.: 4:14-cv-01727-JSW
Plaintiff,
v.
CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant.
STIPULATED VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R.
CIV. P. 41(a)(2) AND (c)(1) AND
PROPOSED ORDER
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 4:14-CV-01727-JSW
Case4:14-cv-01727-JSW Document30 Filed06/18/14 Page2 of 4
1
Plaintiff NetApp, Inc. (“NetApp”) and Defendant Crossroads Systems, Inc. (“Crossroads”),
2
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and (c)(1), hereby move for an order dismissing NetApp’s
3
complaint for declaratory judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,051,147 (“the ’147
4
Patent”) and 7,987,311 (“the ’311 Patent”) without prejudice and all of Crossroads’ counterclaims
5
for infringement for the ’147 Patent and ’311 Patent against NetApp without prejudice, with each
6
party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.
7
8
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
9
10
Dated: June 18, 2014
By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian
Karineh Khachatourian
kkhachatourian@duanemorris.com
David T. Xue
dtxue@duanemorris.com
Patrick S. Salceda
psalceda@duanemorris.com
DUANE MORRIS LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194
11
12
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NETAPP, INC.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: June 18, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Russell T. Wong
WONG CABELLO LUTSCH
RUTHERFORD & BRUCCULERI, LLP
Russell T. Wong
rwong@counselip.com
Texas Bar No. 21884235
Admitted to the NDCA
Houston, TX 77070
Attorneys for Defendant
CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC.
26
27
28
-1STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 4:14-CV-01727-JSW
Case4:14-cv-01727-JSW Document30 Filed06/18/14 Page4 of 4
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
CAME ON THIS DAY for consideration the Stipulated Voluntary Dismissal of all claims
3
asserted by plaintiff NetApp, Inc. (“NetApp”) and all counterclaims asserted by defendant
4
Crossroads Systems, Inc. (“Crossroads”) in the above captioned action, and the Court being of the
5
opinion that said Stipulated Voluntary Dismissal should be GRANTED.
6
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
7
(1) NetApp’s complaint for declaratory judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.
8
7,051,147 (“the ’147 Patent”) and 7,987,311 (“the ’311 Patent”) is hereby dismissed without
9
prejudice;
10
11
12
13
14
(2) Crossroads’ Counterclaim for infringement of the ’147 Patent and the ’311 Patent is
hereby dismissed without prejudice;
(3) It is further ordered that all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses shall be borne by the party
that incurred them; and
(4) The Clerk is directed to close the file.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
June 19
DATED: ____________________, 2014
____________________________________
Jeffrey S. White
United States District Court Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 4:14-CV-01727-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?