NetApp, Inc. v. Crossroads Systems, Inc.

Filing 31

ORDER GRANTING 30 STIPULATION for Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/19/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014)

Download PDF
Case4:14-cv-01727-JSW Document30 Filed06/18/14 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DUANE MORRIS LLP Karineh Khachatourian (SBN 202634) kkhachatourian@duanemorris.com David T. Xue (SBN 256668) dtxue@duanemorris.com Patrick S. Salceda (SBN 247978) psalceda@duanemorris.com 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: 650.847.4150 Facsimile: 650.847.4151 Attorneys for Plaintiff NETAPP, INC. WONG CABELLO LUTSCH RUTHERFORD & BRUCCULERI, LLP Russell T. Wong rwong@counselip.com Texas Bar No. 21884235 Admitted to the NDCA 20333 SH 249, Suite 600 Houston, TX 77070 Telephone: 832.446.2400 Facsimile: 832.446.2424 Attorneys for Defendant CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 NETAPP, INC. 13 14 15 16 17 Case No.: 4:14-cv-01727-JSW Plaintiff, v. CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2) AND (c)(1) AND PROPOSED ORDER Honorable Jeffrey S. White 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 4:14-CV-01727-JSW Case4:14-cv-01727-JSW Document30 Filed06/18/14 Page2 of 4 1 Plaintiff NetApp, Inc. (“NetApp”) and Defendant Crossroads Systems, Inc. (“Crossroads”), 2 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and (c)(1), hereby move for an order dismissing NetApp’s 3 complaint for declaratory judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,051,147 (“the ’147 4 Patent”) and 7,987,311 (“the ’311 Patent”) without prejudice and all of Crossroads’ counterclaims 5 for infringement for the ’147 Patent and ’311 Patent against NetApp without prejudice, with each 6 party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees. 7 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 9 10 Dated: June 18, 2014 By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian Karineh Khachatourian kkhachatourian@duanemorris.com David T. Xue dtxue@duanemorris.com Patrick S. Salceda psalceda@duanemorris.com DUANE MORRIS LLP 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194 11 12 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff NETAPP, INC. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Respectfully submitted, Dated: June 18, 2014 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Russell T. Wong WONG CABELLO LUTSCH RUTHERFORD & BRUCCULERI, LLP Russell T. Wong rwong@counselip.com Texas Bar No. 21884235 Admitted to the NDCA Houston, TX 77070 Attorneys for Defendant CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC. 26 27 28 -1STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 4:14-CV-01727-JSW Case4:14-cv-01727-JSW Document30 Filed06/18/14 Page4 of 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 CAME ON THIS DAY for consideration the Stipulated Voluntary Dismissal of all claims 3 asserted by plaintiff NetApp, Inc. (“NetApp”) and all counterclaims asserted by defendant 4 Crossroads Systems, Inc. (“Crossroads”) in the above captioned action, and the Court being of the 5 opinion that said Stipulated Voluntary Dismissal should be GRANTED. 6 It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 7 (1) NetApp’s complaint for declaratory judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8 7,051,147 (“the ’147 Patent”) and 7,987,311 (“the ’311 Patent”) is hereby dismissed without 9 prejudice; 10 11 12 13 14 (2) Crossroads’ Counterclaim for infringement of the ’147 Patent and the ’311 Patent is hereby dismissed without prejudice; (3) It is further ordered that all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses shall be borne by the party that incurred them; and (4) The Clerk is directed to close the file. 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 June 19 DATED: ____________________, 2014 ____________________________________ Jeffrey S. White United States District Court Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 4:14-CV-01727-JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?