Aliphcom v. QFX, Inc.

Filing 35

ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/10/14. (nahS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP GREGORY S. GILCHRIST (State Bar No. 111536) ggilchrist@kilpatricktownsend.com JENNIFER D. ARKOWITZ (State Bar No. 236598) jarkowitz@kilpatricktownsend.com RYAN T. BRICKER (State Bar No. 269100) rbricker@kilpatricktownsend.com Eighth Floor, Two Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415 576 0200 Facsimile: 415 576 0300 Attorneys for Plaintiff ALIPHCOM 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 ALIPHCOM, a California corporation, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 v. QFX, INC., a California corporation, Civil Action No. 14-cv-1878 PJH PLAINTIFF ALIPHCOM’S REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ITS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT Defendant. 16 Complaint Filed: 17 April 23, 2014 18 19 Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Aliphcom voluntarily seeks to dismiss without 20 prejudice its claims in this Action in accordance with the terms of a settlement agreement between 21 the parties. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL CASE NO. 14-CV-1878 -1- 1 DATED: November 6, 2014 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 2 By: /s/ Ryan Bricker 3 GREGORY S. GILCHRIST JENNIFER D. ARKOWITZ RYAN BRICKER 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff ALIPHCOM 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRIC TC TE ___________________________________________ TA Hon. Phyllis J. HamiltonD ERE O OR United States DistrictDJudge IT IS S RT Judge P ER . A H 12 Hamilton R NIA hyllis J. NO 11 LI 10 FO S 11/10/14 Dated: ____________ UNIT ED 9 RT U O 8 N F D IS T IC T O R C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL CASE NO. 14-CV-1878 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?