Aliphcom v. QFX, Inc.
Filing
35
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/10/14. (nahS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
GREGORY S. GILCHRIST (State Bar No. 111536)
ggilchrist@kilpatricktownsend.com
JENNIFER D. ARKOWITZ (State Bar No. 236598)
jarkowitz@kilpatricktownsend.com
RYAN T. BRICKER (State Bar No. 269100)
rbricker@kilpatricktownsend.com
Eighth Floor, Two Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415 576 0200
Facsimile: 415 576 0300
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ALIPHCOM
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
ALIPHCOM, a California corporation,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
QFX, INC., a California corporation,
Civil Action No. 14-cv-1878 PJH
PLAINTIFF ALIPHCOM’S REQUEST
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ITS
CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT
Defendant.
16
Complaint Filed:
17
April 23, 2014
18
19
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Aliphcom voluntarily seeks to dismiss without
20
prejudice its claims in this Action in accordance with the terms of a settlement agreement between
21
the parties.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 14-CV-1878
-1-
1
DATED: November 6, 2014
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
2
By: /s/ Ryan Bricker
3
GREGORY S. GILCHRIST
JENNIFER D. ARKOWITZ
RYAN BRICKER
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ALIPHCOM
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRIC
TC
TE
___________________________________________
TA
Hon. Phyllis J. HamiltonD
ERE
O OR
United States DistrictDJudge
IT IS S
RT
Judge P
ER
.
A
H
12
Hamilton
R NIA
hyllis J.
NO
11
LI
10
FO
S
11/10/14
Dated: ____________
UNIT
ED
9
RT
U
O
8
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 14-CV-1878
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?