Bagby v. Nagle et al

Filing 8

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, Docket 6 . The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment, terminate all pending motions, and close the file. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/24/14. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 No. C 14-01896 DMR (PR) CEDRIC BAGBY, ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff, v. 8 JUDGE MARGARET A. NAGLE, et al., 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Defendants. / 11 12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner and frequent litigant in federal court, has filed a pro se civil rights 13 complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He also seeks to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 14 U.S.C. § 1915. Dkt. 6. 15 16 17 Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, dkt. 1 at 4, and this matter has been assigned to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. On April 26, 1996, the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PLRA") was enacted and 18 became effective. The PLRA provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil 19 judgment in forma pauperis "if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or 20 detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was 21 dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief 22 may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C. 23 § 1915(g). The only exception to this bar is when a plaintiff is under imminent danger of serious 24 physical injury. See Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307, 312 (3d Cir. 2001) (en banc); 25 Medberry v. Butler, 185 F.3d 1189, 1192-93 (11th Cir. 1999); Ashley v. Dilworth, 147 F.3d 715, 717 26 (8th Cir. 1998); Banos v. O'Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 885 (5th Cir. 1998). 27 28 In an Order dated June 16, 2014, the Court sua sponte raised the § 1915(g) problem in the instant case and notified Plaintiff of the earlier dismissals it considered to support a § 1915(g) dismissal. See Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1120-21 (9th Cir. 2005) (allowing the plaintiff an 2 opportunity to be heard on the matter before dismissing the action under § 1915(g)). The Court 3 determined that Plaintiff has had three prior prisoner actions dismissed on the grounds that they were 4 frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See, e.g., Bagby v. 5 President of Bank of America, No. 13-0225 (D.C. Feb. 22, 2013) (civil rights action dismissed for 6 failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted); Bagby v. Thaler, No. 2:13-CV-0012 7 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2013) (same); Bagby v. Thaler, No. 12-2001 (D.C. Dec. 14, 2012) (civil rights 8 complaint dismissed as frivolous). Because Plaintiff has had three prior dismissals and is not under 9 imminent danger of serious physical injury, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the three 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 1 aforementioned dismissals should not be counted as "strikes" to support a § 1915(g) dismissal. The 11 Court informed Plaintiff that if he failed to file a response to the order to show cause within twenty- 12 eight days, then this action would be dismissed without further notice to Plaintiff. 13 More than twenty-eight days have passed, and Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's 14 Order or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED. See 15 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's refiling his claims in a new 16 case in which he pays the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Dkt. 6. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment, terminate all pending motions, and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 24, 2014 21 22 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 P:\PRO-SE\DMR\CR.14\Bagby1896.DISM-1915(g).wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?