United States of America v. Benson
Filing
58
ORDER DIRECTING THE TRUSTEE TO SERVE NOTICE OF STIPULATION ON PARTIES IN RELATED MATTER CASE 14-CV-2071-YGR re (8 in 4:15-cv-03026-YGR) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER entering judgment filed by Nicholas Saakvitne. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/27/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
NICHOLAS SAAKVITNE,
Case No. 15-cv-03026-YGR
Plaintiff,
ORDER DIRECTING THE TRUSTEE TO
SERVE NOTICE OF STIPULATION ON
PARTIES IN RELATED MATTER
5
v.
6
7
8
9
10
ENERGY, RESEARCH & GENERATION, INC.,
ET AL.,
Defendants.
___________________________________
And related action:
UNITED STATES,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 14-cv-2071
Plaintiff,
11
12
Re: Dkt. No. 8
v.
BURTON ORVILLE BENSON,
Defendant.
On July 1, 2015, Plaintiff Nicholas Saakvitne, Trustee, Plan Administrator and
Independent Fiduciary of the Energy, Research & Generation, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and
Associated Retirement Trust (“the Trustee”) and Defendants Energy, Research & Generation, Inc.,
ERG Aerospace Corporation, and ERG Materials and Aerospace Corporation (“Defendants”) filed
their Stipulation For Entry of Judgment. (Dkt. No. 8, “Stipulation”.) On July 20, 2015, the Court
ordered that the instant action be related to Case No. 14-cv-2071 YGR, United States vs. Burton
Orville Benson. (Dkt. No. 12).
The Court now ORDERS that the Trustee serve a copy of the Stipulation on all parties to
14-cv-2071 YGR, United States vs. Burton Orville Benson no later than July 30, 3015. Any party
seeking to file a response to that Stipulation shall do so no later than August 13, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 27, 2015
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?