Le v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing 8

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 7 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Amending Complaint filed by Linda Le, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/11/14. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Cary Kletter (SBN 21 0230) Sally Trung Nguyen (SBN 267275) KLETTER LAW FIRM LLP 1900 S. Norfolk Street, Suite 350 San Mateo, California 94403 415.434.3400 Attorneys for Plaintiff, LINDALE 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 LINDALE, Case No.: C 14-02225 KAW PLAINTIFF, STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING AMENDING COMPLAINT v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK and DOES 1 - 20, inclusive, 13 14 DEFENDANTS. 15 16 STIPULATION 17 Plaintiff LINDA LE ("LE") and Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK ("CHASE"), 18 19 through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, LE filed an action with the following claims: ( 1) Pregnancy Discrimination; 20 (2) California Family Rights Act ("CFRA") Interference; (3) CFRA Discrimination/Retaliation; 21 (4) Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA'') Retaliation; (5) Wrongful Termination in 22 Violation of Public Policy; (6) Discrimination on the Basis of Disability; (7) Failm·e to 23 Accommodate Disability; (8) Failure to Engage in the Interactive Process; (9) Failure to Provide Seating; and (1 0) Unfair Business Practices; 24 25 26 27 WHEREAS, CHASE filed a Notice of Removal of Civil Action (Federal Question and Diversity) ("Removal"); WHEREAS, counsel for all parties have agreed to allow LE to file the Attached First Amended Complaint; 28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING AMENDING COMPLAINT C 14-02225 KA W I 2 3 4 5 WHEREAS, no trial date has been set; and WHEREAS, none of the parties would be prejudiced by allowing LE to file the First Amended Complaint. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that LE may file the attached First Amended Complaint. 6 7 Dated: June 10, 2014 8 KLETTER LAW FIRM LLP CARYKLETTER SALLY TRUNG NGUYEN By:~- 9 10 Cary~ter II Attomey for Plaintiff LindaLe 12 13 14 Date: June 10,2014 SANCHEZ & AMADOR, LLP JAMIE RUDMAN 15 16 17 18 19 By: c:.L:J ..:7-J --~-=----~ ;:::;:::=Jamie Rudman Attomey for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING AMENDING COMPLAINT C 14-.Q2225 KA W 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 Case No. C 14-02225 KA W LINDALE, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 vs. [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FILING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, inclusive, Defendants. ·--·--·······-··-···--- _________ j Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff LindaLe is granted leave to file the First Amended Complaint. 18 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 6/11/14 The Honorable Kandis A. Westmore United States District Court Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING AMENDING COMPLAINT C 14-02225 KA W

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?