Sherwin-Williams Company v. Henry et al

Filing 28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/24/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/22/2014. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY,
Plaintiff(s),

11

v.

12

HENRY ET AL,

13

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

14
15

Plaintiff Sherwin Williams Company’s motion to dismiss was filed on September 4, 2014.

16

[Docket No. 27.] Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion was

17

due on September 18, 2014, but no such opposition has been received. Defendants Jesse Henry and

18

Superior Automotive Center of San Francisco are ordered to respond by September 24, 2014 and

19

show cause for their failure to respond to the motion in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or

20

alternatively to file a statement of nonopposition to the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7-

21

3(b). This order to show cause does not constitute permission to file a late opposition. The hearing

22

on October 9, 2014 is CONTINUED to October 30, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. If Defendants do not

23

respond by September 24, 2014, Plaintiff’s motion may be granted.

onn

RT

Judge D

H

ER

R NIA

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge . Ryu
aM

NO

28

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

LI

27

Dated: September 22, 2014

A

26

RT
U
O

25

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

24

UNIT
ED

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C-14-02292 DMR

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C