Sherwin-Williams Company v. Henry et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/24/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/22/2014. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HENRY ET AL,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiff Sherwin Williams Company’s motion to dismiss was filed on September 4, 2014.
[Docket No. 27.] Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion was
due on September 18, 2014, but no such opposition has been received. Defendants Jesse Henry and
Superior Automotive Center of San Francisco are ordered to respond by September 24, 2014 and
show cause for their failure to respond to the motion in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or
alternatively to file a statement of nonopposition to the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7-
3(b). This order to show cause does not constitute permission to file a late opposition. The hearing
on October 9, 2014 is CONTINUED to October 30, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. If Defendants do not
respond by September 24, 2014, Plaintiff’s motion may be granted.
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge . Ryu
IT IS S
Dated: September 22, 2014
IT IS SO ORDERED.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-14-02292 DMR
D IS T IC T O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?