Sherwin-Williams Company v. Henry et al

Filing 28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/24/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/22/2014. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, Plaintiff(s), 11 v. 12 HENRY ET AL, 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 14 15 Plaintiff Sherwin Williams Company’s motion to dismiss was filed on September 4, 2014. 16 [Docket No. 27.] Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion was 17 due on September 18, 2014, but no such opposition has been received. Defendants Jesse Henry and 18 Superior Automotive Center of San Francisco are ordered to respond by September 24, 2014 and 19 show cause for their failure to respond to the motion in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or 20 alternatively to file a statement of nonopposition to the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7- 21 3(b). This order to show cause does not constitute permission to file a late opposition. The hearing 22 on October 9, 2014 is CONTINUED to October 30, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. If Defendants do not 23 respond by September 24, 2014, Plaintiff’s motion may be granted. onn RT Judge D H ER R NIA DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge . Ryu aM NO 28 D RDERE OO IT IS S LI 27 Dated: September 22, 2014 A 26 RT U O 25 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO IT IS SO ORDERED. S 24 UNIT ED For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C-14-02292 DMR N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?