Kumar v. Salov North America Corp et al

Filing 111

ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER SUBMISSION ON PENDING MOTIONS TO SEAL. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/19/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2016)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

ROHINI KUMAR, individually and on behalf of
the general public and those similarly situated,

7

Plaintiff,

8
9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11

Case No.: 14-CV-2411- YGR
ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER SUBMISSION
ON PENDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

vs.
SALOV NORTH AMERICA CORP.,
Defendants.

12
13
14

In connection with the pending motion for class certification, the parties have submitted
Administrative Motions to File Under Seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5. (Dkt. Nos. 84, 97, and

15
16
17
18
19
20

108.) Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) provides:
If the Submitting Party is seeking to file under seal a document designated as
confidential by the opposing party or a non-party pursuant to a protective order, or
a document containing information so designated by an opposing party or a nonparty…[w]ithin 4 days of the filing of the filing of the Administrative Motion to
File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a declaration as required by
subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material is
sealable.

21
22

N.D. Cal. Civ. L. R. 79-5(e)(1). Here, on both Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s motions, no declarations

23

in compliance with the requirement stated in Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)(1) have been filed. Moreover,

24

the declaration submitted in connection with Defendant’s motion fails to set forth a sufficient basis

25

to establish good cause for sealing all the matters it has designated confidential or highly

26

confidential and therefore seeks to seal.
27
28

1

The Designating Parties shall file any additional declarations in support of these motions no

2

later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, May 23, 2016. Failure to file adequate supporting declarations

3

will result in denial of the motion(s) at issue.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7

Dated: May 19, 2016
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2