Singh v. Scialabba

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Dismiss filed by Baljeet Singh, Lori Scialabba, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 8/5/14. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2014)

Download PDF
1 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney 2 ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348) Chief, Civil Division 3 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 4 Telephone: (415) 436-6730 FAX: (415) 436-6748 5 Email: Alex.Tse@usdoj.gov 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 BALJEET SINGH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 LORI SCIALABBA, Acting Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, 16 Defendant. ) ) C 14-2463 KAW ) ) ) STIPULATION TO DISMISS and ) [PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) ) ) ) 17 18 Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendant, by and through her attorneys of 19 record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to dismissal of the above-entitled action 20 without prejudice in light of the fact that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services 21 adjudicated Plaintiff=s I-130 Petition for Alien Relative applications. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 STIPULATION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED ORDER] C14-2463 KAW 1 Each of the parties shall bear their own costs and fees. 2 Date: July 24, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 3 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 4 ______/s/____________________ ALEX G. TSE Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 5 6 7 8 Date: July 24, 2014 ________/s/_________________ JONATHAN M. KAUFMAN Attorney for Plaintiff 9 10 ORDER 11 12 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Date: 8/5/14 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED ORDER] C14-2463 KAW __________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?