Singh v. Scialabba
Filing
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Dismiss filed by Baljeet Singh, Lori Scialabba, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 8/5/14. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2014)
1 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
2 ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348)
Chief, Civil Division
3
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
4
Telephone: (415) 436-6730
FAX: (415) 436-6748
5
Email: Alex.Tse@usdoj.gov
6
Attorneys for Defendant
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
BALJEET SINGH,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
LORI SCIALABBA, Acting Director, United
States Citizenship and Immigration Services,
16
Defendant.
)
) C 14-2463 KAW
)
)
) STIPULATION TO DISMISS and
) [PROPOSED] ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
17
18
Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendant, by and through her attorneys of
19 record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to dismissal of the above-entitled action
20 without prejudice in light of the fact that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
21 adjudicated Plaintiff=s I-130 Petition for Alien Relative applications.
22 ///
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27
28
STIPULATION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
C14-2463 KAW
1
Each of the parties shall bear their own costs and fees.
2 Date: July 24, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
3
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
4
______/s/____________________
ALEX G. TSE
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
5
6
7
8 Date: July 24, 2014
________/s/_________________
JONATHAN M. KAUFMAN
Attorney for Plaintiff
9
10
ORDER
11
12
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
13 Date: 8/5/14
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
C14-2463 KAW
__________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?