Liu et al v. Win Woo Trading, LLC et al
Filing
37
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE re 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Settlement Conference with Magistrate Judge James filed by Jia Tun Zheng, Safety Trucking, LLC, Pei Xiong Lin, Kuang Xuan Liu, Mindy Fang, Jia Jing Zheng, Win Woo Trading, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/4/14. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2014)
1 Margaret J. Grover (Bar No. 112701)
Katherine Kao (Bar No. 267475)
2 WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN LLP
th
1111 Broadway, 24 Floor
3 Oakland, California 94607-4036
Telephone: (510) 834-6600
4 Fax: (510) 834-1928
Email: mgrover@wendel.com
5
Attorneys for Defendants Win Woo
6 Trading, LLC; Jia Jing Zheng; and Mindy
Fang
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
10
Case No. 4:14-cv-02639 KAW
12
STIPULATION REGARDING
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE;
REQUEST FOR ASSIGNMENT TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARIA
ELENA JAMES AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
1111 Br o adw ay, 24 t h F lo or
PEI XIONG LIN,
O akland, Ca lif or ni a 946 07-4 036
Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP
11 KUANG XUAN LIU AND
Plaintiffs,
13
vs.
14
WIN WOO TRADING, LLC;
15 SAFETY TRUCKING, LLC;
JIA TUN ZHENG;
16 JIA JING ZHENG;
MINDY FANG,
17
Defendants.
18
19
Plaintiffs Kuang Xuan Liu and Pei Xiong Lin, and Defendants Safety
20 Trucking, LLC, Jia Tung Zheng, Win Woo Trading, LLC, Jia Jing Zheng, and
21 Mindy Fang, by and through their respective attorneys of record enter the following
22 Stipulation for Settlement Conference.
23
WHEREAS, on or about August 27, 2014, the above-captioned case was
24 ordered to mediation through the Northern District Mediation Program; and
25
WHEREAS, following the Case Management Conference on September 9,
26 2014, the matter was referred to an Alternative Dispute Resolution Telephone
27 Conference; and
28
019437.0001\3685220.1
STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
4:14-cv-02639 KAW
1
WHEREAS, the Alternative Dispute Resolution Telephone Conference was
2 held on September 16, 2014; and
3
WHEREAS all parties are in agreement that a Settlement Conference with a
4 Magistrate Judge is the most appropriate form of alternative dispute resolution at the
5 present time:
6
NOW THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, BY AND THROUGH
7 COUNSEL OF RECORD:
8
1.
The parties requests that the assignment to mediation be withdrawn;
9
2.
The matter be referred to a Judicial Settlement Conference pursuant to
10 Alternative Dispute Resolution Rule No. 7; and
3.
Magistrate Judge Maria Elena James conduct the Settlement
1111 Br o adw ay, 24 t h F lo or
12 Conference.
O akland, Ca lif or ni a 946 07-4 036
Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP
11
13
14 DATED: September ___, 2014
LAW OFFICES OF X. YOUNG LAI
15
16
By:
17
X. Young Lai
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Kuang Xuan Liu
and Pei Xiong Lin
18
19
20 DATED: September ____, 2014
JEW & ASSOCIATES
21
22
By:
23
Leon E. Jew
Attorneys for Defendants Safety
Trucking, LLC and Jia Tun Zheng
24
25
26
27
28
019437.0001\3685220.1
STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
2
4:14-cv-02639 KAW
1 DATED: September 17, 2014
WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN LLP
2
3
By:
Margaret J. Grover
Attorneys for Defendants Win Woo
Trading, LLC, Jia Jing Zheng, and Mindy
Fang
4
5
6
7
8
9
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PARTIES’ AGREEMENT, IT IS HEREBY
10 ORDERED:
1.
The August 27, 2014 order requiring the parties to mediate is hereby
1111 Br o adw ay, 24 t h F lo or
12 revoked;
O akland, Ca lif or ni a 946 07-4 036
Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP
11
13
2.
The matter is referred to a Judicial Settlement Conference pursuant to
14 Alternative Dispute Resolution Rule No. 7; and
15
3.
Magistrate Judge Maria Elena James shall conduct the Settlement
16 Conference.
17
11/4
DATED: _______________, 2014
18
19
20
United States Magistrate Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
019437.0001\3685220.1
STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
3
4:14-cv-02639 KAW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?