Liu et al v. Win Woo Trading, LLC et al

Filing 37

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE re 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Settlement Conference with Magistrate Judge James filed by Jia Tun Zheng, Safety Trucking, LLC, Pei Xiong Lin, Kuang Xuan Liu, Mindy Fang, Jia Jing Zheng, Win Woo Trading, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/4/14. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 Margaret J. Grover (Bar No. 112701) Katherine Kao (Bar No. 267475) 2 WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN LLP th 1111 Broadway, 24 Floor 3 Oakland, California 94607-4036 Telephone: (510) 834-6600 4 Fax: (510) 834-1928 Email: mgrover@wendel.com 5 Attorneys for Defendants Win Woo 6 Trading, LLC; Jia Jing Zheng; and Mindy Fang 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION 10 Case No. 4:14-cv-02639 KAW 12 STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; REQUEST FOR ASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARIA ELENA JAMES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 1111 Br o adw ay, 24 t h F lo or PEI XIONG LIN, O akland, Ca lif or ni a 946 07-4 036 Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP 11 KUANG XUAN LIU AND Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 WIN WOO TRADING, LLC; 15 SAFETY TRUCKING, LLC; JIA TUN ZHENG; 16 JIA JING ZHENG; MINDY FANG, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiffs Kuang Xuan Liu and Pei Xiong Lin, and Defendants Safety 20 Trucking, LLC, Jia Tung Zheng, Win Woo Trading, LLC, Jia Jing Zheng, and 21 Mindy Fang, by and through their respective attorneys of record enter the following 22 Stipulation for Settlement Conference. 23 WHEREAS, on or about August 27, 2014, the above-captioned case was 24 ordered to mediation through the Northern District Mediation Program; and 25 WHEREAS, following the Case Management Conference on September 9, 26 2014, the matter was referred to an Alternative Dispute Resolution Telephone 27 Conference; and 28 019437.0001\3685220.1 STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 4:14-cv-02639 KAW 1 WHEREAS, the Alternative Dispute Resolution Telephone Conference was 2 held on September 16, 2014; and 3 WHEREAS all parties are in agreement that a Settlement Conference with a 4 Magistrate Judge is the most appropriate form of alternative dispute resolution at the 5 present time: 6 NOW THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, BY AND THROUGH 7 COUNSEL OF RECORD: 8 1. The parties requests that the assignment to mediation be withdrawn; 9 2. The matter be referred to a Judicial Settlement Conference pursuant to 10 Alternative Dispute Resolution Rule No. 7; and 3. Magistrate Judge Maria Elena James conduct the Settlement 1111 Br o adw ay, 24 t h F lo or 12 Conference. O akland, Ca lif or ni a 946 07-4 036 Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP 11 13 14 DATED: September ___, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF X. YOUNG LAI 15 16 By: 17 X. Young Lai Attorneys for Plaintiffs Kuang Xuan Liu and Pei Xiong Lin 18 19 20 DATED: September ____, 2014 JEW & ASSOCIATES 21 22 By: 23 Leon E. Jew Attorneys for Defendants Safety Trucking, LLC and Jia Tun Zheng 24 25 26 27 28 019437.0001\3685220.1 STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 2 4:14-cv-02639 KAW 1 DATED: September 17, 2014 WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN LLP 2 3 By: Margaret J. Grover Attorneys for Defendants Win Woo Trading, LLC, Jia Jing Zheng, and Mindy Fang 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PARTIES’ AGREEMENT, IT IS HEREBY 10 ORDERED: 1. The August 27, 2014 order requiring the parties to mediate is hereby 1111 Br o adw ay, 24 t h F lo or 12 revoked; O akland, Ca lif or ni a 946 07-4 036 Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP 11 13 2. The matter is referred to a Judicial Settlement Conference pursuant to 14 Alternative Dispute Resolution Rule No. 7; and 15 3. Magistrate Judge Maria Elena James shall conduct the Settlement 16 Conference. 17 11/4 DATED: _______________, 2014 18 19 20 United States Magistrate Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 019437.0001\3685220.1 STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 3 4:14-cv-02639 KAW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?