Elliott v. The Department of Veterens Affairs
Filing
18
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN CIVIL CASE NUMBER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/10/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
VANCE S. ELLIOT,
Plaintiff,
v.
13
14
15
16
No. 14-mc-80009 RS
14-mc-80117 RS
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO
ASSIGN CIVIL CASE NUMBER
THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
17
18
By order issued in Case No. 04-1600 MHP, on February 14, 2006, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel
19
of this district required pre-filing review of all papers submitted by plaintiff Vance Elliot involving
20
any claims that were the subject of or related to the claims in that action. Plaintiff is thus required to
21
obtain leave of court before filing a new complaint.
22
Mr. Elliot filed a complaint in January 2014 against the Department of Veterans Affairs. See
23
ECF No. 1. He filed another complaint against the agency in April 2014. See No. 14-mc-80117.
24
The two cases were deemed related. See id.; ECF No. 4. Because the subject matter of Mr. Elliot’s
25
pending complaints are beyond the scope of the applicable pre-filing review order, the clerk’s office
26
is directed to assign new civil case numbers to both this action (No. 14-mc-80009) and the related
27
action (No. 14-mc-80117).
28
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: 6/10/14
RICHARD SEEBORG
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO:
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Vance S. Elliott
640 Eddy Street, #219
San Francisco, CA 94109
DATED: 6/10/14
13
14
/s/ Chambers Staff
Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?