Elliott v. The Department of Veterens Affairs

Filing 18

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN CIVIL CASE NUMBER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/10/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 VANCE S. ELLIOT, Plaintiff, v. 13 14 15 16 No. 14-mc-80009 RS 14-mc-80117 RS ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN CIVIL CASE NUMBER THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant. ____________________________________/ 17 18 By order issued in Case No. 04-1600 MHP, on February 14, 2006, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel 19 of this district required pre-filing review of all papers submitted by plaintiff Vance Elliot involving 20 any claims that were the subject of or related to the claims in that action. Plaintiff is thus required to 21 obtain leave of court before filing a new complaint. 22 Mr. Elliot filed a complaint in January 2014 against the Department of Veterans Affairs. See 23 ECF No. 1. He filed another complaint against the agency in April 2014. See No. 14-mc-80117. 24 The two cases were deemed related. See id.; ECF No. 4. Because the subject matter of Mr. Elliot’s 25 pending complaints are beyond the scope of the applicable pre-filing review order, the clerk’s office 26 is directed to assign new civil case numbers to both this action (No. 14-mc-80009) and the related 27 action (No. 14-mc-80117). 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: 6/10/14 RICHARD SEEBORG 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO: 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Vance S. Elliott 640 Eddy Street, #219 San Francisco, CA 94109 DATED: 6/10/14 13 14 /s/ Chambers Staff Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?