Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al

Filing 102

UNSEALING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 4/28/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC, Plaintiff, 8 v. Case No. 14-cv-02717-YGR (JSC) 14-cv-03030-YGR (JSC) 14-cv-03031-YGR (JSC) 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, et al., Defendants. UNSEALING ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 101 12 13 On April 20, 2015, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for leave to reopen discovery for 14 the limited purpose of modifying the prosecution bar. (Dkt. No. 100.) The Court filed the April 15 20 Order under seal because various matters referenced therein were filed under seal in this matter. 16 (Id. at 9.) However, the Court noted that it was “not persuaded that anything discussed in th[e] 17 Order is in fact confidential and properly sealable” and required Defendants to inform the Court 18 by no later than April 10 what information, if any, within the Order must remain sealed. (Id.) 19 Defendants have since filed a notice indicating that they do not intend to request that any portion 20 of the Order be maintained under seal. The Court notes that its Order contains no details of or 21 references to the content of documents filed under seal. Accordingly, the Court orders that its 22 April 20 Order be UNSEALED. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 28, 2015 25 26 27 28 ________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?