Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al

Filing 72

ORDER STAYING ACTIONS PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW PROCEEDINGS AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARINGS by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, terminating (65) Motion to Stay in case 4:14-cv-02717-YGR; granting (94) Stipulation in case 4:14-cv-03030-YGR; granti ng (121) Stipulation in case 4:14-cv-03031-YGR. Pursuant to the Stipulation to Stay Actions Pending Inter Partes review proceedings, Case Nos. 4:14-cv-3030-YGR and 4:14-cv-3031-YGR are hereby STAYED pending final exhaustion of inter partes review p roceedings.Compliance hearing set Friday, February 13, 2015 at 9:01am. Joint Statement filed five days prior. The Compliance hearing scheduled for Tuesday, August 19,2014 is VACATED.As previously ordered, Case No. 4:14-cv-2717-YGR is the lead case in this series of patent cases and all documents shall be filed in the 4:14-cv-2717-YGR docket. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS LLC, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 v. Case No.: 14-CV-2717 YGR ORDER STAYING ACTIONS PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW PROCEEDINGS AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARINGS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. This Order Relates To: 14-CV-3030 YGR 14-CV-3031 YGR TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: As previously ordered, Case No. 4:14-cv-02717-YGR is the lead case in this series of patent cases and all documents shall be filed in this docket. Pursuant to the Stipulation to Stay Actions Pending Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Case 23 Nos. 4:14-cv-03030-YGR and 4:14-cv-03031-YGR are hereby STAYED pending final exhaustion of 24 inter partes review proceedings IPR2014-01181, IPR2014-01182, and IPR2014-01184 of U.S. 25 Patent No. 8,532,641. Defendants BlackBerry Limited f/k/a Research in Motion Limited, and 26 BlackBerry Corporation will be estopped from asserting that claims 1-3 and 5-14 of U.S. Patent 27 No. 8,532,641 patent are invalid on any ground that was raised or reasonably could have been 28 raised in inter partes review proceedings IPR2014-01181, IPR2014-01182, and IPR2014-01184 of 1 the ‘641 patent that results in a final written decision under 35 U.S.C. § 318(a). This Order does not 2 preclude any party from moving to reopen these actions. 3 The parties shall submit a joint status report every six months, notifying the Court of the 4 progress of the review proceedings. The first such report shall be filed no later than the first 5 business day of February 2015, with subsequent filings due every six months thereafter, on the first 6 business day of the month. 7 The Court hereby sets a compliance hearing on its 9:01 a.m. Calendar on Friday, February 13, 2015, in Courtroom 1 of the United States Courthouse located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland, 9 California. At least five business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall 10 file either: (a) their joint status report; or (b) a one-page joint statement setting forth an explanation 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 8 for their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the 12 compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the 13 parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in 14 sanctions. 15 This Order terminates Docket No. 65 in Case No. 13-cv-02717-YGR; terminates Docket 16 No. 94 in Case No. 13-cv-03030-YGR; terminates Docket No. 121 in Case No. 13-cv-03031-YGR; 17 and stays Case Numbers 14-cv-03030-YGR and 14-cv-03031-YGR. The compliance hearing 18 scheduled for Tuesday, August 19, 2014 shall be taken off calendar. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 Date: August 14, 2014 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?