Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al

Filing 97

ORDER INCORPORATING DOCKETS IN RELATED CASE AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING THE SAME. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/8/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2015)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 4 5 6 7 AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS LLC, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Lead Case No.: 14-CV-2717 YGR And related case: 14-CV-2966 YGR v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. ORDER INCORPORATING DOCKET IN RELATED CASE AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING THE SAME 12 13 On March 12, 2015, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why Case No. 14-cv-2966 14 should not be administratively terminated. (Dkt. No. 87.) As the Court noted, Lead Case No. 14- 15 cv-2717 and Related Case No. 14-cv-2966 refer to the same underlying action, which has two case 16 numbers—with separate sets of filings—in light of the unique procedural history of the case and its 17 piecemeal transfer to this Court. (See Dkt. No. 55 at 1-2.) Only plaintiff responded to the order to 18 show cause by the response deadline, indicating no objection “in principle” to the administrative 19 closure of Case No. 14-cv-2966, but seeking to ensure the Lead Case docket incorporates the 20 docket entries and filings from the closed docket. (Dkt. No. 95.) Therefore, the Court hereby 21 ORDERS: (1) that the docket entries and filings in Case No. 14-cv-2966 be deemed incorporated 22 into Lead Case No. 14-cv-2717; and (2) that the Clerk administratively close the docket in Case 23 No. 14-cv-2966, but preserve those filings, as is done in the normal course. Future filings should 24 be made only on the Lead Case docket, not on the administratively closed docket. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Date: April 8, 2015 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?