Four Directions et al v. Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United States
Filing
71
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 58 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration; granting 65 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2015)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
FOUR DIRECTIONS, ET AL.,
Case No. 14-cv-03022-YGR
Petitioners,
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR LEAVE
TO FILE MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO ALTER AND
AMEND JUDGMENT PER FRCP 59(E)
6
v.
7
8
9
COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND
DISABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE
OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.,
(Dkt. No. 58, 65)
Respondents.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Respondents The Committee On Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial
12
Conference of the United States and Cathy A. Catterson, in her official capacity as representative
13
of the Office of Circuit Executive, U.S. Courts for the Ninth Circuit, have each filed their separate
14
Motions For Leave To File Motion For Reconsideration Of March 18, 2015 Order Or, In The
15
Alternative, Motion To Alter And Amend The Judgment Pursuant To Rule 59(e). (Dkt. Nos. 58
16
and 65, “the Motions.”) Each Respondent joins in the other’s arguments.
17
18
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-9(d), the Court Orders the filing of additional papers and sets a
hearing on the Motions as follows:
19
(1) Petitioners shall file their response to the Motions no later than May 6, 2015;
20
(2) Respondents shall file their replies on the Motions no later than May 13, 2015;
21
(3) Hearing on the Motions is set for May 26, 2015, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 1, U.S.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
District Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 23, 2015
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?