O. Matthew Thomas v. San Francisco Travel Association

Filing 35

ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL BY PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/8/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 O. MATTHEW THOMAS, Case No. 14-cv-03043-YGR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL BY PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL 9 10 SAN FRANCISCO TRAVEL ASSOCIATION, Re: Dkt. No. 26 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 TO PLAINTIFF AND HIS COUNSEL OF RECORD ELIAS FRANCISCO PORTALES: 13 On August 10, 2015, plaintiff filed a “proposed order,” apparently seeking the withdrawal 14 of his counsel, Elias Francisco Portales. (Dkt. No. 26.) Going forward, according to the 15 “proposed order,” plaintiff seeks to represent himself in pro per. (Id.) If counsel seeks to 16 withdraw from his representation of plaintiff, a motion for withdrawal must be filed. The Court 17 notes, however, that the caption of the complaint lists the plaintiff as “O. MATTHEW THOMAS, 18 an individual, dba VISIT SAN FRANCISCO, LLC.” Thus, the Court is concerned that the real 19 party in interest may be the registered corporation referenced, and not solely an individual. As 20 such, any motion to withdraw shall address why withdrawal is appropriate under these 21 circumstances. See Civ. L.R. 3-9(b) (“A corporation, unincorporated association, partnership or 22 other such entity may appear only through a member of the bar of this Court.”); see also id. at 5- 23 1(c)(2)(D), 11-5. If counsel no longer seeks to withdraw in light of these circumstances, he shall 24 file a statement to that effect by October 15, 2015. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 8, 2015 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?