Tomales Bay Oyster Company et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
Filing
74
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT STATEMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 72 filed by Alliance for Local Sustainable Agriculture, Jeffrey Creque, Saltwater Oyster Depot, Tomales Bay Oyster Company, United States Departm ent of the Interior, Rosa Gamez, Margaret Grade, Hayes Street Grill, Patricia Unterman, Loretta Murphy, Dixon Marine Services, Inc., Cafe Reyes, Osteria Stellina. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/21/2014. (cpS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
TOMALES BAY OYSTER COMPANY, ET AL.,
Case No. 14-cv-03246-YGR
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE
INTERIOR, ET AL.,
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT STATEMENT
AND PROPOSED ORDER VACATING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Re: Dkt. No. 72
Defendants.
Plaintiffs Tomales Bay Oyster Company, et al. and Defendant United States Department of
13
the Interior, et al. have filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order requesting that the Court vacate an
14
October 23, 2014, case management conference. The parties identify Docket Number 20 as the
15
source of the subject Case Management Conference date. However, the preliminary date set
16
therein was expressly vacated by Order Reassigning Case, Docket Number 23 (“All dates
17
presently scheduled are vacated”), and again by Order Relating Cases, Docket Number 29 (“Any
18
case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court”). The
19
parties’ Joint Statement and Proposed Order (Docket Number 72) is therefore DENIED AS MOOT.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 21, 2014
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?