Khan v. Kerry
Filing
27
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/30/15. (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2015)
3
ALAN M. KAUFMAN, ESQ. (California State Bar No. 57449)
KAUFMAN & KAUFMAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW
220 Montgomery Street, Suite 966
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 956-7770
4
Attorney for Plaintiff
1
2
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
SABIA KHAN
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
JOHN F. KERRY, Secretary of State of the
)
United States
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________________ )
Case No. 4:14-cv-3322-KAW
MOTION TO DISMISS; PROPOSED
ORDER
14
Plaintiff SABIA KHAN hereby moves for dismissal of the complaint herein.
15
The complaint seeks review of the November 15, 2011 decision of defendant denying the
16
immigrant visa application of plaintiff’s son, Nasir Khan, based on a finding that he was
17
inadmissible under INA §212(a)(6)(E)(i), 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(6)(E)(i) because of his efforts to conceal
18
his true age to facilitate the immigration of his brother. Defendant has determined that plaintiff’s
19
son was not in fact inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(6)(E)(i) and issued a new decision on
20
January 28, 2015 (Exhibit 1). As a result, the issues raised in the complaint are now moot.
21
22
Dated: January 29, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
23
s/Alan M. Kaufman
______________________
Alan M. Kaufman
Attorney for Plaintiff
24
25
26
27
28
1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Pursuant to plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the compliant herein, IT IS SO ORDERED
3
January
Signed this 30th day of _____________, 2015
____
5
H
ER
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2
hyllis J.
n
Hamilto
LI
RT
8
Judge P
R NIA
NO
7
FO
S
UNIT
ED
RT
U
O
___________________________
HON. PHYLLISRJ.ERED
HAMILTON
OO D
IT IS S
U.S. District Judge
6
28
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
4
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?