Hanson v. John Muir Health

Filing 8

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/23/2014. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/30/2014 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/13/14. (nahS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2014)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

CHRISTINA HANSON,

Case No. 14-cv-03492-PJH

Plaintiff,
5
v.

ORDER SETTING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

6
7

JOHN MUIR HEALTH,

[Reassigned Case]

Defendant.
8
9

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The above matter having been reassigned to the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton. It is

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

hereby ordered, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Civil L. R. 16-10, that a Case

12

Management Conference shall be held in this case on October 30, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., in

13

Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Federal Building, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California.

14

Lead counsel shall meet and confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) prior to

15

the Case Management Conference with respect to those subjects set forth in Fed. R. Civ.

16

P. 16(c). Not less than seven (7) days before the conference, counsel shall file a joint

17

case management statement addressing each of the items listed in the "Standing Order

18

For All Judges of the Northern District -- Contents of Joint Case Management statement,"

19

which is attached to this order and can also be found on the court's website. A proposed

20

order is not necessary. Following the conference, the court will enter its own Case

21

Management and Pretrial Order. If any party is proceeding without counsel, separate

22

statements may be filed by each party.

23

Each party shall appear personally or by lead counsel prepared to address all of

24

the matters referred to in this Order and with authority to enter stipulations and make

25

admissions pursuant to this Order. Any request to reschedule the date of the conference

26

shall be made in writing, and by stipulation if possible, at least ten (10) days before the

27

date of the conference and must be based upon good cause.

28

1

STANDING ORDER FOR ALL JUDGES

2

OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

CONTENTS OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

5

Commencing July 1, 2011, all judges of the Northern District of California will

6

require identical information in Joint Case Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil

7

Local Rule 16-9. The parties must include the following information in their statement

8

which, except in unusually complex cases, should not exceed ten pages:

9

1.

Jurisdiction and Service: The basis for the court’s subject matter jurisdiction

over plaintiff’s claims and defendant’s counterclaims, whether any issues exist regarding

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

personal jurisdiction or venue, whether any parties remain to be served, and, if any

12

parties remain to be served, a proposed deadline for service.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

2.

Facts: A brief chronology of the facts and a statement of the principal

factual issues in dispute.
3.

Legal Issues: A brief statement, without extended legal argument, of the

disputed points of law, including reference to specific statutes and decisions.
4.

Motions: All prior and pending motions, their current status, and any

anticipated motions.
5.

Amendment of Pleadings: The extent to which parties, claims, or defenses

20

are expected to be added or dismissed and a proposed deadline for amending the

21

pleadings.

22

6.

Evidence Preservation: A brief report certifying that the parties have

23

reviewed the Guidelines Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information

24

(“ESI Guidelines”), and confirming that the parties have met and conferred pursuant to

25

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) regarding reasonable and proportionate steps taken to preserve

26

evidence relevant to the issues reasonably evident in this action. See ESI Guidelines

27

2.01 and 2.02, and Checklist for ESI Meet and Confer.

28

7.

Disclosures: Whether there has been full and timely compliance with the
2

1

initial disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, and a description of the disclosures

2

made.

3

8.

Discovery: Discovery taken to date, if any, the scope of anticipated

4

discovery, any proposed limitations or modifications of the discovery rules, a brief report

5

on whether the parties have considered entering into a stipulated e-discovery order, a

6

proposed discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and any identified discovery

7

disputes.

8

9.

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Class Actions: If a class action, a proposal for how and when the class will

be certified.
10.

Related Cases: Any related cases or proceedings pending before another

judge of this court, or before another court or administrative body.
11.

Relief: All relief sought through complaint or counterclaim, including the

13

amount of any damages sought and a description of the bases on which damages are

14

calculated. In addition, any party from whom damages are sought must describe the

15

bases on which it contends damages should be calculated if liability is established.

16

12.

Settlement and ADR: Prospects for settlement, ADR efforts to date, and a

17

specific ADR plan for the case, including compliance with ADR L.R. 3-5 and a description

18

of key discovery or motions necessary to position the parties to negotiate a resolution.

19

13.

Consent to Magistrate Judge For All Purposes: Whether all parties will

20

consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings including trial and

21

entry of judgment. ___ Yes

22
23
24

14.

___ No

Other References: Whether the case is suitable for reference to binding

arbitration, a special master, or the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
15.

Narrowing of Issues: Issues that can be narrowed by agreement or by

25

motion, suggestions to expedite the presentation of evidence at trial (e.g., through

26

summaries or stipulated facts), and any request to bifurcate issues, claims, or defenses.

27
28

16.

Expedited Trial Procedure: Whether this is the type of case that can be

handled under the Expedited Trial Procedure of General Order No. 64 Attachment A. If all
3

1

parties agree, they shall instead of this Statem
ment, file an executed Agreement for
n
t

2

Ex
xpedited Trial and a Jo Expedited Case M
oint
Managemen Statemen in accord
nt
nt,
dance with

3

Ge
eneral Orde No. 64 At
er
ttachments B and D.

4
5
6
7
8
9

17.

Scheduling Proposed dates for designation of experts discovery cutoff,
g:
d
n
s,
y

hearing of dis
spositive mo
otions, pretrial confere
ence and tri
ial.
18.

Trial: Whet
ther the cas will be tr
se
ried to a jur or to the court and the
ry

exp
pected leng of the tr
gth
rial.
19.

Disclosure of Non-par Intereste Entities or Persons Whether each party
rty
ed
s:

has filed the “Certificatio of Interes
“
on
sted Entities or Person required by Civil Lo
s
ns”
d
ocal Rule
3-1 In addition, each party must restate in th case management statement t
16.
p
r
he
the

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

contents of its certificatio by identifying any p
s
on
persons, firm partner
ms,
rships, corp
porations

12

(including par
rent corpora
ations) or other entitie s known by the party t have eith (i) a
o
y
to
her:

13

fina
ancial inter
rest in the subject matt in contro
s
ter
oversy or in a party to the procee
n
eding; or (ii)
)

14

any other kind of interest that could be substantially affec
d
d
cted by the outcome o the
of

15

pro
oceeding.

16
17

20. Such other ma
atters as may facilitate the just, s
m
e
speedy and inexpensiv
d
ve
dis
sposition of this matter
r.

18
19
20
21
22

S
RED.
IT IS SO ORDER
Da
ated: Augus 13, 2014
st
4
__
__________
__________
__________
_________
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge

23
24
25
26
27
28
4