Technology Properties Limited, LLC v. Seiko Epson Corporation et al
Filing
50
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 46 Stipulation Selecting Mediation. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2014)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
6
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED,
LLC and MCM PORTFOLIO LLC,
7
8
9
10
Case No. 4:14-cv-03646-CW
STIPULATION BETWEEN
PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS
SEIKO EPSON CORP. AND EPSON
AMERICA, INC. AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Plaintiffs,
v.
SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
13
Counsel for plaintiffs and for defendants Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America,
14
Inc. report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
15
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-7 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
16
17
18
Plaintiffs and defendants Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc. agree to
participate in the following ADR Process: Court-sponsored mediation (ADR L.R. 6).
Plaintiffs and defendants Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc. agree to hold
19
the ADR session by the presumptive deadline.
20
Dated: October 29, 2014
21
Benjamin R. Askew
THE SIMON LAW FIRM
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Technology Properties
Limited, LLC and MCM Portfolio, LLC
22
23
24
25
26
27
/s/ Benjamin R. Askew
Dated: October 29, 2014
/s/ Matthew J. Hertko
Matthew J. Hertko
JONES DAY
Attorneys for Defendants Seiko Epson Corp. and
Epson America, Inc.
28
STIPULATION RE ADR AND PROPOSED ORDER
Case No. 4:14-cv-03646-CW
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
___
X
3
Plaintiffs’ and defendants Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc.’s
stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
___
6
Plaintiffs’ and defendants Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc.’s
stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
10
11
12
Dated:
10/31/2014
____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADR
Case No. 4:14-cv-03646-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?