Chappelle et al v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 42

ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing set for 4/17/2015 is CONTINUED to Friday, 4/24/2015 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/14/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARLES CHAPPELLE, ET AL., Case No. 14-cv-03745-YGR Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING Re: Dkt. No. 41 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 In light of the parties’ joint statement filed on April 10, 2015 (Dkt. No. 41), the Court 13 hereby CONTINUES the compliance hearing set for April 17, 2015 to Friday, April 24, 2015, on 14 the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, 15 Courtroom 1. 16 The Court cannot discern from the parties’ joint statement (Dkt. No. 41) what necessary 17 information is missing and the specifics of the dispute as to the sufficiency of the proffer that has 18 been made. Thus, by April 17, 2015, the parties shall file either: (1) an updated joint statement 19 advising the Court that all necessary information has been provided or outlining the specifics of 20 the dispute regarding the sufficiency of information provided; or (2) a one-page joint statement 21 setting forth an explanation for their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need 22 not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be 23 allowed if the parties have submitted a Joint Statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may 24 result in sanctions. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2015 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?