Kenenth E. Melia v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 14

ORDER Directing Parties To Inform Court Whether They Consent To Magistrate Judge For All Purposes. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/13/2015. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2015)

1

UNITED STATES D
DISTRICT C
COURT

2

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CAL
N
RN
CT
LIFORNIA

3
4

KENNETH E MELIA,

5

Plaintiff,
v.

6
7

CAROLYN W. COLVIN
C
W
N,

8

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-037
793-PJH
ORDER D
DIRECTING PARTIES TO
G
S
INFORM C
COURT WH
HETHER T
THEY
CONSENT TO MAG
T
GISTRATE J
JUDGE
FOR ALL PURPOSE
ES

9
In case assigned to a distric judge, the parties m consent at any tim to
es
d
ct
may
me

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

rea
assignment of the case to a magi
t
e
istrate judge for all purposes, inc
cluding entry of final
y

12

jud
dgment. Se Civil L.R 73-1(b). This option is being m
ee
R.
T
made availab because the
ble

13

ma
agistrate jud
dges in this district hav smaller civil docket and no fe
s
ve
ts
elony crimin cases
nal

14

and may be able to adjudicate this case more expeditiously than the undersign district
a
e
ned

15

jud
dge.

16

Accord
dingly, the parties are hereby DIR
p
RECTED to advise the court, no later than
e

17

Ma
arch 27, 2015, whethe they cons
er
sent to have a magistr
e
rate judge c
conduct all f
further

18

pro
oceedings in the instan action. Normally the parties w
nt
N
would be dir
rected to so inform the
o
e

19

cou in their Joint Case Manageme Stateme filed in c
urt
J
ent
ent
connection with the in
nitial case

20

ma
anagement conference Howeve because this case involves a r
e.
er,
review of an
n

21

administrative record, a case mana
e
agement co
onference has not been scheduled. The

22

parties are ad
dvised that they may jo
ointly reque assignm
est
ment to a sp
pecific magi
istrate

23

jud
dge. For the parties’ convenience a consen form is at
c
e,
nt
ttached her
reto; forms are also

24

ava
ailable at http://www.c
cand.uscourts.gov, in t "Forms" section.
the
"

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: March 13, 2015
h

___
__________
__________
__________
_______
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

KENNETH E MELIA,

8

Plaintiff,

9

v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

Case No. 14-cv-03793-PJH
CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE

Defendant.

12
13

CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14

In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. Section 636(c), the

15

undersigned party or parties to the above-captioned civil matter hereby voluntarily

16

consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further

17

proceedings in the case, including trial, and order the entry of a final judgment. Appeal

18

from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the

19

Ninth Circuit.

20
21

______________________________

______________________________

23

______________________________

______________________________

24

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney for Defendant

22

25
26
27
28

Dated:_________________________