Mabutas v. Colley et al

Filing 36

ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 07/01/2015. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANTHONY MICHAEL MABUTAS, Case No. 14-cv-03796-KAW Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 9 10 JAMES COLLEY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 35 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 On June 2, 2015, the parties to the above-captioned case filed a Stipulated Protective 14 Order, Dkt. No. 35. They did not, however, indicate whether they were using a model protective 15 order or a modified protective order as required by the Court’s Standing Order. (See Judge 16 Westmore’s General Standing Order ¶ 11.) 17 Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration 18 stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders except for the addition of 19 case-identifying information or the elimination of language denoted as optional; (b) a declaration 20 explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the 21 proposed protective order with the model order; or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of 22 the model orders is not practicable. (See id.) 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 07/01/2015 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?