AAT Bioquest, Inc. v. Texas Fluorescence Laboratories, Inc.

Filing 50

STIPULATION AND ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 05/01/15. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2015)

Case4:14-cv-03909-DMR Document47-1 Filed04/28/15 Page2 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Deborah E. Fishman (SBN 197584)
Krista M. Carter (SBN 225229)
KAYE SCHOLER LLP
Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 400
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
AAT BIOQUEST, INC.
Rick B. Yeager (Texas SBN 22146500)
10805 Mellow Lane
Austin, TX 78759
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Defendant
TEXAS FLUORESENCE
LABORATORIES, INC.

12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
OAKLAND DIVISION
16
17
18

AAT BIOQUEST, INC., a Delaware
corporation

19
20
21
22
23

Plaintiff,
v.
TEXAS FLUORESENCE
LABORATORIES, INC.,
Defendant.

24
25

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:14-cv-3909-(DMR)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT
INJUNCTION
Judge:

Hon. Donna M. Ryu

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, as well as Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, Plaintiff AAT Bioquest, Inc.

26

(“AAT Bioquest”) and Defendant Texas Fluorescence Laboratories, Inc. (“TEFLabs” or

27

“Defendant”) jointly submit the following Stipulation and proposed Order for a permanent

28

injunction against any further infringement by Defendant of AAT Bioquest’s patent rights:
STIPULATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTON

-1-

Case No. 4:14-cv-3909-DMR

Case4:14-cv-03909-DMR Document47-1 Filed04/28/15 Page3 of 5

1
2

WHEREAS, this patent infringement action commenced on August 28, 2014 by AAT
Bioquest against TEFLabs involving U.S. Patent No. 8,779,165 (the “’165 Patent”);

3

WHEREAS, AAT Bioquest is the owner of all right, title, and interest in the ’165 patent;

4

WHEREAS, AAT Bioquest and TEFLabs filed a Joint Case Management Statement (D.N.

5

21) on November 26, 2014, wherein the Parties agreed that TEFLabs’ Fluo-2 MA AM product

6

infringed Claim 1 of the ’165 Patent, and that TEFLabs would be enjoined if that claim were held

7

valid and enforceable;

8

WHEREAS, the Court issued an Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

9

and Denying Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.N. 46) on April 13, 2015, wherein the

10

Court denied TEFLabs’ Motions for Summary Judgment regarding invalidity and unenforceability

11

of the ‘165 Patent, and granted AAT Bioquest’s Motions of Summary Judgment for no invalidity

12

and no inequitable conduct;

13
14
15
16
17

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby STIPULATE to this Injunction and IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
a. Subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and venue are all proper in this
Court.
b. Defendant TEFLabs is permanently restrained, enjoined and prohibited from further

18

infringement of the ’165 Patent, and from manufacturing, using, selling, importing,

19

and/or offering for sale fluo indicators which have the same structure as the indicator

20

claimed in Claim 1 of the ’165 Patent in the United States for the life of the ’165

21

Patent.

22

c. This injunction applies to TEFLabs, its present or future members, its present or

23

future managers, and its present or future employees, agents, and contractors, and any

24

successors-in-interest.

25

d. Nothing in this injunction shall be construed as granting TEFLabs a license to the

26

’165 Patent or otherwise permitting TEFLabs to infringe AAT Bioquest’s patent

27

rights, past, present, or future.

28

e. This injunction shall expire on January 5, 2029.
STIPULATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTON

-2-

Case No. 4:14-cv-3909-DMR

Case4:14-cv-03909-DMR Document47-1 Filed04/28/15 Page4 of 5

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

3
4

Dated: April 28, 2015

5

Respectfully submitted,
KAYE SCHOLER LLP

6
By:

7

/s/ Krista Carter
Krista M. Carter (SBN 225229)

8
Attorney for Plaintiff
AAT BIOQUEST, INC.

9
10
11

By:

12
13

/s/ Rick B. Yeager
Rick B. Yeager (Texas SBN 21146500)

Attorney for Defendant
TEXAS FLUORESENCE LABORATORIES, INC.

14
15

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDRED.

NO

20

RT

21

onna
Judge D
ER

23

A

H

22

M. Ryu

R NIA

19

________________________RED
RDE
HON. DONNA M.O O
IT IS S RYU
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FO

18

LI

Dated: May 1, 2015

UNIT
ED

17

RT
U
O

S

16

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTON

-3-

Case No. 4:14-cv-3909-DMR