Shah v. Rocket Fuel Inc. et al
Filing
214
ORDER re Refiling of Documents Lodged Under Seal per 210 Order on Administrative Motions to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 02/09/2017. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2017)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
Case No. 14-cv-03998-PJH
5
6
IN RE ROCKET FUEL INC.
7
SECURITIES LITIGATION
ORDER RE: REFILING OF
DOCUMENTS LODGED UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 210
8
9
10
On January 24, 2017, the court denied all of the parties’ motions for leave to file
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
under seal (Dkt. 183, 195, 201), permitting only the redaction of employee names, the
12
names of specific third-party clients of Rocket Fuel, and the (partial) sealing of two
13
technical documents. Dkt. 210 at 11. The court ordered the parties to refile their briefs
14
and supporting papers on the public docket, with appropriate redactions, within 14 days
15
of the court’s ruling. Id. at 11–12. Refiling was therefore due by February 7, 2017. On
16
that day, lead plaintiffs publicly refiled their papers in accordance with the court’s order.
17
Dkt. 213.
18
Defendants have refiled redacted versions of two of the documents that it
19
conditionally filed under seal in their entirety: Exhibits 6 and 7 to the Mitchell Declaration
20
(Dkt. 195-1). Dkt. 211, 212. However, defendants have not publicly refiled Exhibits 8, 9,
21
and 10 to the Mitchell Declaration, which were also conditionally filed under seal. See
22
Dkt. 195-10, 195-11, 195-12. Defendants shall publicly refile appropriately redacted
23
versions of these documents forthwith, in accordance with the court’s prior order.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 9, 2017
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?