Shah v. Rocket Fuel Inc. et al

Filing 214

ORDER re Refiling of Documents Lodged Under Seal per 210 Order on Administrative Motions to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 02/09/2017. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 Case No. 14-cv-03998-PJH 5 6 IN RE ROCKET FUEL INC. 7 SECURITIES LITIGATION ORDER RE: REFILING OF DOCUMENTS LODGED UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. No. 210 8 9 10 On January 24, 2017, the court denied all of the parties’ motions for leave to file United States District Court Northern District of California 11 under seal (Dkt. 183, 195, 201), permitting only the redaction of employee names, the 12 names of specific third-party clients of Rocket Fuel, and the (partial) sealing of two 13 technical documents. Dkt. 210 at 11. The court ordered the parties to refile their briefs 14 and supporting papers on the public docket, with appropriate redactions, within 14 days 15 of the court’s ruling. Id. at 11–12. Refiling was therefore due by February 7, 2017. On 16 that day, lead plaintiffs publicly refiled their papers in accordance with the court’s order. 17 Dkt. 213. 18 Defendants have refiled redacted versions of two of the documents that it 19 conditionally filed under seal in their entirety: Exhibits 6 and 7 to the Mitchell Declaration 20 (Dkt. 195-1). Dkt. 211, 212. However, defendants have not publicly refiled Exhibits 8, 9, 21 and 10 to the Mitchell Declaration, which were also conditionally filed under seal. See 22 Dkt. 195-10, 195-11, 195-12. Defendants shall publicly refile appropriately redacted 23 versions of these documents forthwith, in accordance with the court’s prior order. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 9, 2017 __________________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?