Palacios v. Cosco Home and Office Products, Inc.
Filing
78
ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER RE JOINT FILINGS ( 70 Proposed Jury Instructions), ( 71 Proposed Form of Verdict). Joint jury instructions and joint proposed form of verdict due by March 31 at noon or Plaintiff will be deemed to have waived objections to 70 and 71 . Plaintiff to lodge exhibits before 4:00 p.m. today. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 03/30/2016. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
VICTOR PALACIOS,
Case No. 14-cv-04066-KAW
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
AMERIWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Defendant.
Re: Dkt. Nos. 70, 71
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE
WITH CASE MANAGEMENT AND
PRETRIAL ORDER RE JOINT
FILINGS
12
The case management and pretrial order entered in this action states that by March 29,
13
14
2016, the parties were to:
[S]ubmit proposed jury instructions jointly. If there are any instructions on which the parties
cannot agree, those instructions may be submitted separately. The parties shall submit a jointly
prepared proposed form of verdict, or, if the parties cannot agree, their respective proposals[.]
15
16
17
(Dkt. No. 28 at 5 ¶ 5.c.(4) (emphasis in original).)
On March 29, 2016, Defendant filed its own proposed verdict form and jury instructions
18
19
because Plaintiff's counsel had apparently not responded to emails seeking Plaintiff's input. (See Dkt.
20
Nos. 70, 71.) Plaintiff is ordered to meet and confer with Defendant to prepare and file joint jury
21
instructions and a joint proposed form of verdict, which shall be filed by no later than March 31, 2016
22
at noon. If joint filings are not submitted by that deadline, Plaintiff will be deemed to have waived
23
any objections to Defendant's jury instructions and to Defendant's proposed form of verdict.
The parties are reminded that the Court requires strict adherence to the case management and
24
25
pretrial order. Any untimely filings will, therefore, be stricken.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Additionally, Plaintiff has not lodged his proposed trial exhibits, which were to be delivered to
2
chambers on March 29, 2016. (Dkt. No. 28 at 5-6 ¶ 5.c.(8).) Those exhibits shall be lodged before
3
4:00 p.m. today.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 03/30/2016
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?