Shalene Steward v. Teresa Thurman et al
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 17 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Shalene Steward and Defendants filed by Shalene Steward, Case referred to mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 1/6/15. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2015)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SHALENE STEWARD
Plaintiff(s),
v.
CASENO. C 1404474KAW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
TERESA THURMAN, et al. ,
Defendant( s).
__________________________!
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
D
D
IZJ
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form . They must instead file a Notice ofNeedfor
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
)!J;ivate Process:
Private ADR (please identifY process and provider) ___________________
U
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
X
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
D
D
other requested deadline------------------------------------
Dated: 12/15/14
Dated: 12/ 15114
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[!)~(;,~
David Grabill
[PROPOSED] ORDER
X
D
D
Dated:
The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
1/6/15
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."
Rev. 12111
Page 2 of2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?