Shalene Steward v. Teresa Thurman et al

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE[FRCP RULE 41(a)(1)] filed by Elaine T Smith, Shirley xx, Trisha Thurman Denny, Frank Breyer, Teresa Thurman, Houser Holdings AZ LLC, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 7/17/15. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

GERALD K. CARROLL, State Bar #142054
WENDY M. SCHENK, State Bar# 177397
HARDIMAN & CARROLL, INC.
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 420
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Defendants
TERESA THURMAN, TRISHA THURMAN DENNEY,
ELAINE T. SMITH, HOUSER HOLDINGS AZ, LLC,
FRANK BEYER (erroneously sued herein as “Frank Breyer”),
and SHIRLEY PRESLER (erroneously sued herein as “Shirley X”)
DAVID GRABILL, State Bar# 46758
LAW OFFICE OF DAVID GRABILL
1930 Alderbrook Lane
Santa Rosa, CA 94506
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff SHALENE STEWARD

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

OAKLAND DISTRICT

19

SHALENE STEWARD,

20

Plaintiff,

21
vs.
22
Hardiman & Carroll
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 420
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]

23
24
25
26

TERESA THURMAN, TRISHA
THURMAN DENNEY and ELAINE T.
SMITH dba WINE COUNTRY RV PARK
SONOMA, HOUSER HOLDINGS AZ,
LLC, FRANK BREYER and SHIRLEY X,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. C 14-04474 KAW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO DISMISS
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE[FRCP
RULE 41(a)(1)]
Action Filed: 10/05/2014

27
28

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE[FRCP RULE 41(a)(1)]
c:\users\imbria~1\appdata\local\temp\notesf8c1a4\pl007.order.dismissal.docx

1

Having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation To Dismiss Action With Prejudice pursuant to

2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), filed on July 7, 2015 (Docket No. 26), and GOOD

3

CAUSE appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED and

4

that the above-captioned action, including all causes of action against all Defendants, is

5

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear their own fees and costs.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

7/17/15
Dated: _________________

8

_____________________________________
HON. KANDIS A. WESTMORE
Magistrate Judge, United States District Court

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE[FRCP RULE 41(a)(1)]
c:\users\imbria~1\appdata\local\temp\notesf8c1a4\pl007.order.dismissal.docx