Twitter, Inc. v. Holder et al
ORDER DENYING GOVERNMENT'S REQUEST FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting in part 115 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 14-cv-04480-YGR
ORDER DENYING GOVERNMENT’S REQUEST
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CONFERENCE;
SETTING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE
LORETTA LYNCH, ET AL.,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 115, 116
Plaintiff filed its Second Amended Complaint on May 24, 2016. (Dkt. No. 114.) On June
13, 2016, Defendants filed a request for a summary judgment pre-filing conference as well as an
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Administrative Motion for Extension of Time to File a response to the Second Amended
Complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 115, 116.)
The Court DENIES the request for a summary judgment pre-filing conference. Defendants
have offered no legal authority or argument suggesting that permitting them to file a motion under
Rule 56 at this juncture in this case—prior to any responsive pleading, a Rule 16 scheduling
conference, and an opportunity for discovery—would be appropriate.
Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time to File a response the Second Amended
Complaint is GRANTED IN PART. Defendants shall file any motion to dismiss or answer no later
than July 5, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
This terminates Docket Nos. 115 and 116.
Dated: June 17, 2016
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?