Twitter, Inc. v. Holder et al

Filing 55

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 37 Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief; granting 42 Motion for Leave to File; granting 46 Motion for Leave to File; granting 49 Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief; granting 52 Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief. The briefs submitted with the motions and requests are DEEMED FILED as of February 17, 2015, and no additional filing is necessary. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 TWITTER, INC., Case No. 14-cv-04480-YGR Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 9 ERIC H. HOLDER, ET AL., ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS Re: Dkt. Nos. 37, 42, 46, 49, 52 Defendants. 10 The Court has considered the motions and requests of the following amici who seek to United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 submit briefs in support of Plaintiff Twitter, Inc.’s opposition to the Partial Motion of Defendants 13 Eric Holder, et al. to Dismiss: 14  Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (Dkt. No. 37); 15  Corporations 1 & 2 (Dkt. No. 42); 16  Automattic Inc.; CloudFlare, Inc.; CREDO Mobile, Inc.; A Medium Corporation; Sonic.net, Inc.; Wickr, Inc.; and the Wikimedia Foundation (Dkt. No. 46); 17 18  BuzzFeed, Inc., First Look Media, Inc., Guardian News & Media (publisher of The 19 Guardian), National Public Radio, Inc., PEN American Center, and WP Company LLC 20 (d/b/a The Washington Post) (Dkt. No. 49); and 21  22 Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the motions and requests for leave to file amicus Freedom of the Press Foundation (Dkt. No. 52). 23 curiae briefs. The briefs submitted with the motions and requests are DEEMED FILED as of 24 February 17, 2015, and no additional filing is necessary. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 18, 2015 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?