Eng v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing 20

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING. Show Cause Response due by 12/5/2014. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 11/14/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DAVID K. ENG, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiff, No. C 14-04626 JSW v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ACQUIRER OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, et al., ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING 14 Defendants. 15 / 16 17 On October 23, 2014, Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank (“Defendant”) filed a motion 18 to dismiss. After the case was reassigned to the undersigned Judge, Defendant re-noticed the 19 motion for a hearing on December 12, 2014. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and is not a 20 registered e-filer. Under the Northern District Civil Local Rules, Plaintiff’s opposition would 21 have been due on November 10, 2014. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). 22 Plaintiff did not file an opposition by that date, and Defendant has filed a notice of non- 23 opposition. In addition, Plaintiff has not made an appearance since Defendant removed the 24 matter to this Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why 25 this case should not be dismissed. If Plaintiff seeks to file an untimely opposition to 26 Defendant’s motion, he must submit a request showing good cause for his failure to file an 27 opposition within the time required by the Local Rules and shall submit a proposed opposition 28 brief with any such request. Plaintiff’s response to this Order to Show Cause shall be due by no 1 later than December 5, 2014. If Plaintiff fails to file a response by that date, the Court shall 2 dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 3 The Court VACATES the hearing set for December 12, 2014, pending Plaintiff’s 4 response to this Order. If Plaintiff seeks to file a belated opposition, and if the Court grants that 5 request, the Court shall re-set the hearing date and set a deadline by which Defendant must file 6 its reply brief. 7 The Court HEREBY ADVISES Plaintiff that a Handbook for Pro Se Litigants, which Court’s website or in the Clerk’s office. The Court also advises Plaintiff that he also may wish 10 to seek assistance from the Legal Help Center. Plaintiff may call the Legal Help Center at 415- 11 For the Northern District of California contains helpful information about proceeding without an attorney, is available through the 9 United States District Court 8 782-8982 or sign up at the United States District Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, 12 California, Room 470S, for a free appointment with an attorney who may be able to provide 13 basic legal help, but not legal representation. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: November 14, 2014 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 ENG, Case Number: CV14-04626 JSW 6 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 v. 8 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS 9 ACQUIRER OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF WASHINGTON 10 MUTUAL BANK et al, Defendant. / 12 13 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 14 That on November 14, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by 15 placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an 16 inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 17 18 19 David K. Eng 5347 Bancroft Avenue 20 Oakland, CA 94601-5807 21 22 Dated: November 14, 2014 23 24 25 26 27 28 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?