Allison v. Lawrence et al
Filing
68
ORDER RE ORDER OF MOTIONS. Motion Hearing set for 12/18/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 11/9/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
SHELLEY ALLISON,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
No. C 14-04813 JSW
v.
JUDITH LAWRENCE, ET AL.,
ORDER RE ORDER OF MOTIONS
13
Defendants.
14
15
___________________________________/
16
Plaintiff has noticed a motion for appointment of Connie Valentine as guardian ad litem for
17
the two minor children in this matter and set the hearing on that motion for December 4, 2015. The
18
motion to dismiss the second amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
19
12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants Xavier Shabazz, Emily Amott, Donald Patchin, and
20
Contra Costa County (“County Defendants”) and the motion to dismiss filed by Judicial Council,
21
Contra Costa Superior Court, and the State of California (“State Defendants”) are both set for
22
hearing on November 13, 2015.
23
As the Court has previously held, absent a legal guardian, the two minor children lack
24
capacity to sue. If no guardian ad litem is appointed, the claims on their behalf must be dismissed.
25
See Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 373(a). Because the Court finds that the threshold issue of proceeding as
26
minors must be addressed prior to resolving the pending motions to dismiss, the Court HEREBY
27
CONTINUES the hearing on the motion for appointment of guardian ad litem and the two pending
28
motions to dismiss to an open date on the Court’s calendar, on December 18, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. The
1
briefing schedule on the appointment of guardian motion does not change.
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 9, 2015
_________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?