Allison v. Lawrence et al

Filing 68

ORDER RE ORDER OF MOTIONS. Motion Hearing set for 12/18/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 11/9/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SHELLEY ALLISON, 10 11 12 Plaintiff, No. C 14-04813 JSW v. JUDITH LAWRENCE, ET AL., ORDER RE ORDER OF MOTIONS 13 Defendants. 14 15 ___________________________________/ 16 Plaintiff has noticed a motion for appointment of Connie Valentine as guardian ad litem for 17 the two minor children in this matter and set the hearing on that motion for December 4, 2015. The 18 motion to dismiss the second amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants Xavier Shabazz, Emily Amott, Donald Patchin, and 20 Contra Costa County (“County Defendants”) and the motion to dismiss filed by Judicial Council, 21 Contra Costa Superior Court, and the State of California (“State Defendants”) are both set for 22 hearing on November 13, 2015. 23 As the Court has previously held, absent a legal guardian, the two minor children lack 24 capacity to sue. If no guardian ad litem is appointed, the claims on their behalf must be dismissed. 25 See Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 373(a). Because the Court finds that the threshold issue of proceeding as 26 minors must be addressed prior to resolving the pending motions to dismiss, the Court HEREBY 27 CONTINUES the hearing on the motion for appointment of guardian ad litem and the two pending 28 motions to dismiss to an open date on the Court’s calendar, on December 18, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. The 1 briefing schedule on the appointment of guardian motion does not change. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 9, 2015 _________________________ JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?