Acero v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
Filing
32
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING.Case Management Conference scheduled for 7/20/15 is VACATED and Compliance Hearing re class counsel's motion for preliminary approval is set for Friday, 9/4/2015 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/14/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
PEDRO ACERO,
Case No. 14-cv-4928 YGR
8
Plaintiff,
9
vs.
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND SETTING COMPLIANCE
HEARING
10
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND,
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
Defendant.
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
In light of the parties’ second joint case management statement, the Case Management
Conference currently scheduled for July 20, 2015 is hereby VACATED, and a compliance hearing
regarding class counsel’s motion for preliminary approval shall be held on Friday, September 4, 2015
on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California,
18
Courtroom 1.
19
Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, either: (a) class counsel
20
shall file a motion for preliminary approval; or (b) the parties shall file a one-page JOINT STATEMENT
21
setting forth an explanation for failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be
allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result
in sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 14, 2015
____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?