Center for Food Safety et al v. Hamburg et al

Filing 85

ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT FDA'S POSITION re 82 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed by Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), Center for Food Safety, United Farm Workers of America, Center for Biological Diversity, Animal Legal Defense Fund, Sierra Club. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/2/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2015)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4 CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, CENTER FOR
BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, and SIERRA CLUB,
5
Plaintiffs,
6
and
7
8 THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED
STATES, UNITED FARM WORKERS, and
9 ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND,
10

Plaintiffs,

Consolidated Case Nos. 4:14-cv-04932-YGR
and 4:14-cv-04933-YGR

ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO REPLY IN
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT FDA’S POSITION
Re: Dkt. No. 82

v.

11

MARGARET A. HAMBURG, Commissioner,
12 United States Food & Drug Administration, and the
13 FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION,
Defendants,

14
15 and

16 ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH,
17

Intervenor-Defendant.

18
19
20

Having reviewed Plaintiffs’ request to file a reply in opposition to Defendant FDA’s position

21 brief (Dkt. No. 82), the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ request.
22

Plaintiffs shall file their reply, non-repetitive of their prior response (Dkt. No. 80) and not to

23 exceed three (3) pages in length, no later than Wednesday, October 7, 2015.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28

Dated: October 2, 2015
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE