Macdonald et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A
Filing
86
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 85 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Pretrial Documents. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)
THOMAS N. ABBOTT (State Bar No. 245568)
JASON M. JULIAN (State Bar No. 215342)
jmj@severson.com
SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 398-3344
Facsimile: (415) 956-0439
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
MATHEW D. MELLEN (Bar No. 233350)
SARAH SHAPERO (Bar No. 281748)
MELLEN LAW FIRM
One Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415)315-1653
Facsimile: (415)276-1902
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
BRET MACDONALD and AMALIA MACDONALD
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
BRET MACDONALD, an individual; and
AMALIA MACDONALD, an individual,
20
21
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Plaintiffs,
18
19
Case No.: 3:14-CV-04970-HSG
vs.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Action Filed:
Trial Date:
Defendants.
November 10, 2014
May 1, 2016
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
55000.1452/8381366.1
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES
1
2
3
4
Pursuant to the Civil Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California, the parties, Plaintiffs BRETT MACDONALD and AMALIA
MACDONALD (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”),
through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the following:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
RECITALS
1.
WHEREAS, on September 21, 2017, this Court set this matter for trial for May 1,
2017 and set a pretrial conference for April 18, 2017;
2.
WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court’s Civil Pretrial and Trial Standing Order, the
Parties Pretrial Filings and any oppositions to the Motions in Limine filed in this matter are due
no later than April 4, 2017;
3.
WHEREAS, on March 29, 2017, this Court referred this matter to Judge Joseph C.
Spero for a Settlement Conference;
4.
WHEREAS, on March 29, 2017, Judge Joseph C. Spero set this matter for a
Settlement Conference to occur on April 4, 2017; and
5.
WHEREAS, in an effort to keep costs in this litigation down and to facilitate
settlement of this matter, the Parties request that the deadline for the Pretrial Filings and
Oppositions to Motions in Limine be extended to April 11, 2017.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
55000.1452/8381366.1
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES
1
2
3
4
STIPULATION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that
1.
The deadline for Pretrial Filings and Oppositions to Motions in Limine is extended
from April 4, 2017 to April 11, 2017.
5
Respectfully Submitted,
6
7
Dated: March 30, 2017
SEVERSON & WERSON
8
9
By:
_/s/ Jason M. Julian________
Jason M. Julian, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
10
11
12
13
Dated: March 30, 2017
MELLEN LAW FIRM
14
15
By:
_/s/ Sarah Shapero_________
Sarah Shapero, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
BRETT MACDONALD and AMALIA
MACDONALD
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
55000.1452/8381366.1
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES
1
2
3
ORDER
This Court, having received and reviewed the stipulation of the parties referenced
immediately above, and finding good cause therefore, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties;
4
The deadline for Pretrial Filings and Oppositions to Motions in Limine is extended from
5
6
7
April 4, 2017 to April 11, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: _____________, 2017
March 31
________________________________________
_____________________________________
_ ____________ _ _ _ __ __
____
__ _ ___
_____
_
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
H
Honorable H
ab Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.
d
ll
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
55000.1452/8381366.1
4
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?