Macdonald et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A

Filing 86

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 85 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Pretrial Documents. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622) THOMAS N. ABBOTT (State Bar No. 245568) JASON M. JULIAN (State Bar No. 215342) jmj@severson.com SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. MATHEW D. MELLEN (Bar No. 233350) SARAH SHAPERO (Bar No. 281748) MELLEN LAW FIRM One Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415)315-1653 Facsimile: (415)276-1902 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, BRET MACDONALD and AMALIA MACDONALD 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 BRET MACDONALD, an individual; and AMALIA MACDONALD, an individual, 20 21 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL DEADLINES Plaintiffs, 18 19 Case No.: 3:14-CV-04970-HSG vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Action Filed: Trial Date: Defendants. November 10, 2014 May 1, 2016 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.1452/8381366.1 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES 1 2 3 4 Pursuant to the Civil Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the parties, Plaintiffs BRETT MACDONALD and AMALIA MACDONALD (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the following: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 RECITALS 1. WHEREAS, on September 21, 2017, this Court set this matter for trial for May 1, 2017 and set a pretrial conference for April 18, 2017; 2. WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court’s Civil Pretrial and Trial Standing Order, the Parties Pretrial Filings and any oppositions to the Motions in Limine filed in this matter are due no later than April 4, 2017; 3. WHEREAS, on March 29, 2017, this Court referred this matter to Judge Joseph C. Spero for a Settlement Conference; 4. WHEREAS, on March 29, 2017, Judge Joseph C. Spero set this matter for a Settlement Conference to occur on April 4, 2017; and 5. WHEREAS, in an effort to keep costs in this litigation down and to facilitate settlement of this matter, the Parties request that the deadline for the Pretrial Filings and Oppositions to Motions in Limine be extended to April 11, 2017. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.1452/8381366.1 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES 1 2 3 4 STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that 1. The deadline for Pretrial Filings and Oppositions to Motions in Limine is extended from April 4, 2017 to April 11, 2017. 5 Respectfully Submitted, 6 7 Dated: March 30, 2017 SEVERSON & WERSON 8 9 By: _/s/ Jason M. Julian________ Jason M. Julian, Esq. Attorney for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 10 11 12 13 Dated: March 30, 2017 MELLEN LAW FIRM 14 15 By: _/s/ Sarah Shapero_________ Sarah Shapero, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs BRETT MACDONALD and AMALIA MACDONALD 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.1452/8381366.1 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES 1 2 3 ORDER This Court, having received and reviewed the stipulation of the parties referenced immediately above, and finding good cause therefore, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties; 4 The deadline for Pretrial Filings and Oppositions to Motions in Limine is extended from 5 6 7 April 4, 2017 to April 11, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: _____________, 2017 March 31 ________________________________________ _____________________________________ _ ____________ _ _ _ __ __ ____ __ _ ___ _____ _ Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. H Honorable H ab Haywood S Gilliam, Jr. d ll 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.1452/8381366.1 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?