SONG FI, INC. v. GOOGLE, INC. et al
Filing
150
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting 148 Administrative Motion for Extension of Time to File Expert Report. Plaintiff's Expert Damages Report due 11/7/2016. Defendant's Expert Damages Report due 12/7/2016. Plaintiffs Rebuttal due 12/21/2016. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2016)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
SONG FI, INC., JOSEPH N.
BROTHERTON, LISA M. PELLEGRINO,
N.G.B., RASTA ROCK, INC.,
6
Plaintiffs,
7
8
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
ORDER GRANTING
ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE EXPERT
REPORT
v.
GOOGLE, INC., YOUTUBE LLC,
9
10
No. C 14-5080 CW
Defendants.
________________________________/
11
12
Plaintiffs file this administrative motion for a three-week
13
extension of time to file the report of their chief damages
14
expert.
15
R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4).
16
diligence of the moving party.”
Noyes v. Kelly Servs., 488 F.3d
17
1163, 1174 n.6 (9th Cir. 2007).
Plaintiffs indicate that their
18
damages expert has not received documents on which he seeks to
19
base his expert report and that as a consequence he refused to
20
file his expert report by the deadline set by the Court.
21
Plaintiffs must show good cause for an extension.
Fed.
This inquiry “focuses on the reasonable
Plaintiff’s proffered showing of good cause is weak; however,
22
in an abundance of caution and due to the drastic consequences of
23
being denied a damages expert, the Court grants the requested
24
relief.
25
weeks of the deadline established in the Court’s scheduling order.
26
Thus the new deadline is November 7.
27
be granted without new and extraordinary good cause.
28
notes that the extension requested will not provide Plaintiffs
Plaintiffs may file an expert damages report within three
No further extensions will
The Court
1
with sufficient time to file a belated motion to compel discovery
2
of the documents sought by Plaintiffs’ damages expert from
3
Defendants.
4
expert is shortened as proposed in Plaintiffs’ motion.
5
6
7
Finally, Plaintiffs’ deadline to designate a rebuttal
For the foregoing reasons and subject to the foregoing
conditions, Plaintiffs’ administrative motion is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Dated: October 31, 2016
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?