Adams v. Social Security Administration
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice for Failure to Prosecute.Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 02/11/2015. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
BIANCA KAMILAH ADAMS,
12
Plaintiff(s),
13
v.
14
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
15
No. C-14-05274 DMR
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
16
17
Plaintiff Bianca K. Adams filed this action on August 18, 2014 seeking judicial review of a
18
final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. The action was removed
19
to this court on December 2, 2014. In accordance with Local Rule 16-5, Plaintiff was to file a
20
motion for summary judgment within 28 days of receipt of Defendant’s answer, which was filed on
21
December 9, 2014. Plaintiff did not file a motion for summary judgment. On January 12, 2015, the
22
court issued an Order to Show Cause, ordering Plaintiff to submit a written statement by no later
23
than January 28, 2015 explaining why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
24
The court noted that Plaintiff’s failure to respond by January 28, 2015 may result in the dismissal of
25
this action. [Docket No. 13.]
26
Plaintiff did not respond to the Order to Show Cause. Accordingly, this matter is hereby
27
dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
28
41(b).
Dated: February 11, 2015
4
NO
DONNA M. RYU
. Ryu
United States Magistratena M
on Judge
ge D
RT
7
8
9
10
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
ER
H
6
Jud
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
LI
5
A
3
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
R NIA
2
FO
UNIT
ED
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?