Adams v. Social Security Administration

Filing 14

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice for Failure to Prosecute.Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 02/11/2015. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 BIANCA KAMILAH ADAMS, 12 Plaintiff(s), 13 v. 14 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 15 No. C-14-05274 DMR Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 16 17 Plaintiff Bianca K. Adams filed this action on August 18, 2014 seeking judicial review of a 18 final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. The action was removed 19 to this court on December 2, 2014. In accordance with Local Rule 16-5, Plaintiff was to file a 20 motion for summary judgment within 28 days of receipt of Defendant’s answer, which was filed on 21 December 9, 2014. Plaintiff did not file a motion for summary judgment. On January 12, 2015, the 22 court issued an Order to Show Cause, ordering Plaintiff to submit a written statement by no later 23 than January 28, 2015 explaining why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 24 The court noted that Plaintiff’s failure to respond by January 28, 2015 may result in the dismissal of 25 this action. [Docket No. 13.] 26 Plaintiff did not respond to the Order to Show Cause. Accordingly, this matter is hereby 27 dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 28 41(b). Dated: February 11, 2015 4 NO DONNA M. RYU . Ryu United States Magistratena M on Judge ge D RT 7 8 9 10 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court ER H 6 Jud 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 LI 5 A 3 DERED O OR IT IS S R NIA 2 FO UNIT ED S IT IS SO ORDERED. RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?