DSS Technology Management, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 252

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 251 Stipulation to Continue Mediation Deadline Re Docket No. 183 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 MARK FOWLER (Bar No. 124235) mark.fowler@dlapiper.com CLAYTON THOMPSON (Bar No. 291331) clayton.thompson@dlapiper.com YAKOV M. ZOLOTOREV (Bar No. 224260) jake.zolotorev@dlapiper.com SAORI KAJI (Bar No. 260392) saori.kaji@dlapiper.com SUMMER TORREZ (Bar No. 264858) summer.torrez@dlapiper.com JONATHAN HICKS (Bar No. 274634) jonathan.hicks@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 Tel: 650.833.2000 Fax: 650.833.2001 ERIN P. GIBSON (Bar No. 229305) erin.gibson@dlapiper.com JACOB D. ANDERSON (Bar No. 265768) jacob.anderson@dlapiper.com PETER MAGGIORE (Bar No. 292534) peter.maggiore@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 401 B Street, Suite 1700 San Diego, CA 92101-4297 Tel: 619.699.2700 Fax: 619.699.2701 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, INC., 23 24 25 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 14-cv-05330 HSG JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE v. APPLE INC. 26 Defendant. 27 28 DLA P I PER LLP (US) WEST\287517208.1 -1- JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG) 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-1(a)(5), and 7-12, Plaintiff DSS Technology 2 Management, Inc. (“DSS”) and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”), through their respective counsel 3 of record, hereby stipulate and request the Court to extend the deadline for the parties to complete 4 mediation until September 6, 2019: 5 6 WHEREAS, on January 16, 2019, the Court entered a Scheduling Order, setting the Mediation Deadline for August 30, 2019 (Dkt. 183); 7 WHEREAS, the parties selected Retired District Court Judge Gandhi as their mediator; 8 WHEREAS, the parties, their counsel, and Judge Gandhi are each available for mediation 9 10 11 12 13 on Thursday, September 5, 2019; WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend the deadline for completing the mediation by seven (7) calendar days, from August 30, 2019 to September 6, 2019; WHEREAS, the extension of the deadline for mediation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already set by this Court in this case. 14 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that pursuant to Northern 15 District of California Local Rule 7-12, the deadline for the Parties to complete mediation shall be 16 extended by seven (7) calendar days, from August 30, 2019 to September 6, 2019. 17 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DLA P I PER LLP (US) WEST\287517208.1 -2JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG) 1 2 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), concurrence to the filing of this document was obtained from Kenneth Kula, counsel for DSS Technology Management, Inc., on August 21, 2019. 3 4 Dated: August 21, 2019 DLA PIPER LLP (US) 5 By /s/ Summer Torrez MARK D. FOWLER CLAYTON THOMPSON YAKOV M. ZOLOTOREV ERIN P. GIBSON SAORI KAJI SUMMER TORREZ JACOB D. ANDERSON JONATHAN HICKS PETER MAGGIORE 6 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 12 13 BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC 14 15 By /s/ Kenneth Kula KENNETH KULA CHRISTOPHER M. JOE ERIC W. BUETHER BRIAN A. CARPENTER 16 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff DSS Technology Management, Inc. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DLA P I PER LLP (US) WEST\287517208.1 -3JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG) 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 2 3 Dated: 8/22/2019 4 By 5 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DLA P I PER LLP (US) WEST\287517208.1 -4JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?