DSS Technology Management, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
252
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 251 Stipulation to Continue Mediation Deadline Re Docket No. 183 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
MARK FOWLER (Bar No. 124235)
mark.fowler@dlapiper.com
CLAYTON THOMPSON (Bar No. 291331)
clayton.thompson@dlapiper.com
YAKOV M. ZOLOTOREV (Bar No. 224260)
jake.zolotorev@dlapiper.com
SAORI KAJI (Bar No. 260392)
saori.kaji@dlapiper.com
SUMMER TORREZ (Bar No. 264858)
summer.torrez@dlapiper.com
JONATHAN HICKS (Bar No. 274634)
jonathan.hicks@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
2000 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214
Tel: 650.833.2000
Fax: 650.833.2001
ERIN P. GIBSON (Bar No. 229305)
erin.gibson@dlapiper.com
JACOB D. ANDERSON (Bar No. 265768)
jacob.anderson@dlapiper.com
PETER MAGGIORE (Bar No. 292534)
peter.maggiore@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101-4297
Tel: 619.699.2700
Fax: 619.699.2701
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT,
INC.,
23
24
25
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 14-cv-05330 HSG
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE
v.
APPLE INC.
26
Defendant.
27
28
DLA P I PER LLP (US)
WEST\287517208.1
-1-
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE
CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-1(a)(5), and 7-12, Plaintiff DSS Technology
2
Management, Inc. (“DSS”) and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”), through their respective counsel
3
of record, hereby stipulate and request the Court to extend the deadline for the parties to complete
4
mediation until September 6, 2019:
5
6
WHEREAS, on January 16, 2019, the Court entered a Scheduling Order, setting the
Mediation Deadline for August 30, 2019 (Dkt. 183);
7
WHEREAS, the parties selected Retired District Court Judge Gandhi as their mediator;
8
WHEREAS, the parties, their counsel, and Judge Gandhi are each available for mediation
9
10
11
12
13
on Thursday, September 5, 2019;
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend the deadline for completing the mediation
by seven (7) calendar days, from August 30, 2019 to September 6, 2019;
WHEREAS, the extension of the deadline for mediation will not alter the date of any
event or any deadline already set by this Court in this case.
14
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that pursuant to Northern
15
District of California Local Rule 7-12, the deadline for the Parties to complete mediation shall be
16
extended by seven (7) calendar days, from August 30, 2019 to September 6, 2019.
17
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P I PER LLP (US)
WEST\287517208.1
-2JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE
CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)
1
2
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), concurrence to the filing of this document was obtained
from Kenneth Kula, counsel for DSS Technology Management, Inc., on August 21, 2019.
3
4
Dated: August 21, 2019
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
5
By /s/ Summer Torrez
MARK D. FOWLER
CLAYTON THOMPSON
YAKOV M. ZOLOTOREV
ERIN P. GIBSON
SAORI KAJI
SUMMER TORREZ
JACOB D. ANDERSON
JONATHAN HICKS
PETER MAGGIORE
6
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.
12
13
BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC
14
15
By /s/ Kenneth Kula
KENNETH KULA
CHRISTOPHER M. JOE
ERIC W. BUETHER
BRIAN A. CARPENTER
16
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DSS Technology Management, Inc.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P I PER LLP (US)
WEST\287517208.1
-3JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE
CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
2
3
Dated: 8/22/2019
4
By
5
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P I PER LLP (US)
WEST\287517208.1
-4JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE
CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?